"called in the Hebrew tongue Bethesda" - Another Theory on the JFK Assassination

Around Tokyo

Another Theory on the JFK Assassination

There is a Japanese theory about the assassination of JFK.

A Japanese professor who had studied the JFK Assassination for decades wrote a book about the secret of the JFK Assassination in 2003.  His conclusion is that a US Navy high-ranking officer planned for himself to assassinate President Kennedy in the summer of 1962.

It was not initiated by an initiative of Vice President Johnson, ex-Vice President Nixon, FBI Director Hoover, Mafia bosses such as Carlos Marcello and Salvatore "Sam" Giancana, or ex-CIA　Director Allen Welsh Dulles.  But the assassination plan was made by a single US Navy officer.

This officer was ranked so high that he had daily contact with leading officers in the State Department, CIA, FBI, and other governmental agencies in addition to the Department of Defense.  Through communications with top bureaucrats and chiefs of those agencies, the US Navy officer found that there were many who wanted to kill JFK.  And if they should find that he put into practice the JFK assassination plan, they would rather help and support him.  They would rather help him hide from investigations.

With this notion and confidence, the US Navy officer ventured into forming a plan, contacting Mafia bosses, manipulating some CIA agents, and mobilizing some of his men.  In this process, he picked up Oswald as a decoy.

One interesting line is that this US Navy officer had known Oswald when two of them happened to be stationed in Japan in the late 1950s.  The US Navy officer was working in an intelligence section in a US base in Japan.  Oswald was in charge of helping operation of the spy jet U2 that was flying from a US air base in Japan to the sky of the Soviet Union.

Though Oswald was conveniently pulled into this assassination scheme, he was not told that he was now a member of the JFK hit team.  Oswald was just doing as he was ordered to do.  Oswald did not carry his rifle to the Texas School Book Depository, though he brought a curtain rail in a paper bag to the Depository in the morning of November 22, 1963, as he was so instructed.  Oswald was not in the sixth floor of the Depository when total four hit men fired at JFK.  Oswald happened to leave the Depository after the JFK assassination, which had not been planned, since Oswald was expected to be arrested and shot at by the police in the Depository.  Oswald went to the movie theater by his own thought as the place had been used as a contact place with his handler.  Oswald who had realized that he was truly involved in the terrible JFK assassination must have been a little upset.  So, he entered the movie theater without buying a ticket.  However, Oswald did not lose his confidence in his handlers or manipulators.  So, Oswald kept silence about his association with his handlers or manipulators.

The Dallas police officer Tippit was beforehand hired for some role such as helping real Kennedy shooters run away.  But along with a proceeding of the assassination plan, the problem about evacuation of real shooters was solved in a different way.  Tippit was of no use.  He was ordered to stay in his house as he was off duty on the assassination day.  It was a mystery why Tippit put on the police uniform and was driving an old patrol car.  Anyway, when the US Navy officer was informed by one of his men immediately after the shooting at JFK that Tippit was driving around districts where Oswald and Ruby lived, he ordered to shoot and kill Tippit, which was so executed.

Jack Ruby was really a convenient guy. He had connections with Mafia boss Marcello, who provided two shooters, and Santo Trafficante Jr. of Florida, who also sent two gun men.  Ruby happened to become a key person for success in this assassination plan.  But, he carried it out by shooting Oswald in the corridor leading to a garage inside the Dallas Police Department.

Subsequently, every key person, such as Johnson and Hoover, helped cover the US Navy officer though how much those power elites knew the whole scheme of the JFK Assassination was unclear.  And, it was also unclear who actually worked under direct order from the US Navy officer.  Probably, ex-CIA/FBI agents involved in the Bay of Pigs invasion must have been acting for this assassination plan, since Oswald's pro-Castro activities in New Orleans were a key element in this plan and it needed cooperation from CIA/FBI guys who had been in charge of anti-Cuban activities in New Orleans.

However, the most important point of this theory is that the JFK Assassination was planned and pushed forward by a single US Navy officer who was highly ranked and had various connections with key figures in various governmental organizations.  He could even make financing of this plan by himself.  He could divert some of the Navy budget to this plan.  He paid big money to the four shooters of JFK by stealing a US defense budget.  It was well covered as the US Government increased a budget for the Vietnam War after the death of JFK.        

Believe or not, there is still a mystery about what happened on the dead body of President Kennedy in the navy hospital in Washington DC.  It is so strange that we have only a few photographs and vague reports about the remains of JFK.

Anyway, there was a possibility that one individual US Navy officer could plan and carry out the assassination of JFK using Mafia supplied hit men, Oswald, Ruby, etc., though he would be in Washington DC on November 22, 1963.



The reason why the US Navy officer wanted to kill JFK seems to have been a little complicated.  He himself might have been secretly manipulated by some others.  But one of decisive factors was his opposition to JFK's support for African Americans, according to the Japanese theory.

So, the African American issue is very dangerous.  Probably President Obama cannot reveal the truth of the JFK Assassination.

FILE - In this May 1958 file photo, Lee Harvey Oswald, poses for the camera while stationed at Atsuge, Japan as a U.S. Marine. In early phases of his service at U.S. bases he got good performance evaluations and qualified as a sharpshooter after marksmanship training. But he was court-martialed twice while stationed in Japan, first after wounding himself with an unauthorized pistol and later after a bar fight. (AP Photo)
http://m.ajc.com/gallery/news/who-was-lee-harvey-oswald/gCF7k/




**** **** ****




Joh 5:2 Now there is at Jerusalem by the sheep market a pool, which is called in the Hebrew tongue Bethesda, having five porches.
Joh 5:3 In these lay a great multitude of impotent folk, of blind, halt, withered, waiting for the moving of the water.
Joh 5:4 For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.
Joh 5:5 And a certain man was there, which had an infirmity thirty and eight years.
Joh 5:6 When Jesus saw him lie, and knew that he had been now a long time in that case, he saith unto him, Wilt thou be made whole?
Joh 5:7 The impotent man answered him, Sir, I have no man, when the water is troubled, to put me into the pool: but while I am coming, another steppeth down before me.
Joh 5:8 Jesus saith unto him, Rise, take up thy bed, and walk.

"he went up into a mountain" - JFK Assassination and African American Plights

Around Tokyo

JFK Assassination and African American Plights

One shocking fact about African Americans is that some of them have disappeared from the mainstream of the society rather mysteriously.

1.5 Million Missing Black Men 

By JUSTIN WOLFERS, DAVID LEONHARDT and KEVIN QUEALY APRIL 20, 2015 

For every 100 black women not in jail, there are only 83 black men. The remaining men – 1.5 million of them – are, in a sense, missing.
17 missing black men for every 100 black women“Missing” men 

Among cities with sizable black populations, the largest single gap is in Ferguson, Mo.
40 missing black men for every 100 black women 

North Charleston, S.C., has a gap larger than 75 percent of cities.
25 missing black men for every 100 black women 

This gap – driven mostly by incarceration and early deaths – barely exists among whites.
1 missing white man for every 100 white women 

Figures are for non-incarcerated adults who are 25 to 54.

In New York, almost 120,000 black men between the ages of 25 and 54 are missing from everyday life. In Chicago, 45,000 are, and more than 30,000 are missing in Philadelphia. Across the South — from North Charleston, S.C., through Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi and up into Ferguson, Mo. — hundreds of thousands more are missing. 

They are missing, largely because of early deaths or because they are behind bars. Remarkably, black women who are 25 to 54 and not in jail outnumber black men in that category by 1.5 million, according to an Upshot analysis. For every 100 black women in this age group living outside of jail, there are only 83 black men. Among whites, the equivalent number is 99, nearly parity.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/04/20/upshot/missing-black-men.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=0

This state of existence of African Americans is truly horrible.  But evil force that has caused this state must be rooted deeply in the US society.

But what President took an opposite stance to the African American issue?

Why Blacks Loved John F. Kennedy

His brief presidency didn't introduce any new civil rights laws, but JFK appointed African Americans to high positions and acknowledged Latino concerns.

BY: RICHARD PRINCEPosted: Nov. 19 2013 9:27 PM

Fifty years after John F. Kennedy's assassination, it's easy for some to dismiss his brief presidency, as conservative commentator Brit Hume did on "Fox News Sunday." Hume, a senior political analyst for FOX News Channel, said of Kennedy on Sunday, "despite the thinness of the record . . . he has been the subject of the most successful public relations campaign in political history. . . . it is a legend bordering, I think, on myth." But Kennedy's ties with blacks and Latinos were no myth during those tumultuous years when the civil rights movement was gaining steam and African Americans, particularly, were seeking allies in the White House. Black journalists, some of whom were in the trenches covering the movement of which they were necessarily a part, shared in that hope. 

"Even though he would leave no new civil rights laws as his legacy," Simeon Booker, the retired longtime correspondent for Ebony and Jet magazines, wrote this year in his autobiography, "Shocking the Conscience: A Reporter's Account of the Civil Rights Movement," "JFK nevertheless captured the heart of black America, becoming the best-loved chief executive in history. 

"Applauded for appointing Negroes to high offices, Kennedy went even further, breaking down many racial barriers in informal ways. He probably hosted more blacks at White House events than had ever entered the mansion in all previous administrations combined. His appointment of top black leaders including the NAACP's top lawyer, Thurgood Marshall, whom he named to the federal bench, for awhile had some blacks wondering if the new president was actually trying to stall the civil rights movement by a brain drain of its key resources. . . .

Then-Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kennedy with delegates at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles in 1960.

ROBERT ABBOTT SENGSTACKE/GETTY IMAGES

http://www.theroot.com/blogs/journalisms/2013/11/why_black_americans_loved_president_john_f_kennedy.html

As long as truth of the assassination of JFK is not revealed, plights of African Americans would continue, if other African Americans should become US President.

The largest reason for the assassination of JFK could be his intention to help support improvement of the social status of African Americans.  It might have been a risky strategy.  With votes from African Americas John F. Kennedy would win elections more easily, but many European Americans might come to hate JFK even only for this reason.  And especially, some elite white Americans who would not otherwise try to remove JFK might be determined to kill JFK for the racial matter.

The racial matter is always dangerous, since Christ Jesus had a difficult conversation with a Samaritan woman though there seem to have been no big differences between Israelites and Samaritans to us.





**** **** **** ****


Mat 5:1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him:
Mat 5:2 And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,
Mat 5:3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

"Whereunto shall we liken the kingdom of God" - Marxism without Love to Neighbors

Tokyo

Marxism without Love to Neighbors

Karl Marx blamed capitalists.  But he didn't blame all the rich men, part of which are capitalists.

Karl Marx had a rich friend, Friedrich Engels.  Actually the living of Marx was supported by money provided by Engels.  Marx, himself, was a kind of scholar whose duty looked like just going to the British Museum to study and check economic data and documents the British Government issued.  Marx had no experiences of working as a laborer.  Though he always lacked money, his living standard was above ordinary laborers, which means he was a kind of rich man.

So, Marxism was created by dirty money Engels earned and gave to Marx.  It cannot be holy.  Marxism is one of products of rotten rich Europeans: Marx and Engels.  It cannot fully serve poor people, workers, laborers, and revolutionists.  It is a kind of theory in a whisky glass.

If you deny capitalists, you have to deny all the rich men of whatever type.  In this context, you have to deny Marx.  What he presented was a theory of anti-capitalism devised by a rich man for laborers.  But the theory needed by poor people must be one of anti-wealth devised by a holy man.

There is an assumption in Marx's theory.  All the capitalists are 100% evil.  It is true capitalists are evil, but they are also human beings.  They enjoy wealth more than they harm and destroy laborers.  And, laborers can find a chance to be a kind of capitalists, since the world has more diversified elements than the framework of capital and labor.

In other word, you have to develop Marxism more.  Your enemies are not only capitalists but all the rich men and evil men.  And as the core of capitalism is accumulation of money, you have to directly focus on money.  Indeed, what should have been written is The Theory of Money rather than Capitalism.  Your true enemy is money.  Capitalism is just one of derivatives of evil of money.

Then you will not trust any theories thought up by a scholar supported by a rich man.  Therefore, you should not trust Marx and his books.

Money makes some people capitalists, while it makes some others scholars of Marxism.  Satan can use both the camps.  Of course, money makes some others leaders of cults or pseudo-religious organizations.  Whatever is made possible by money is not holy.  It is ultimately against God.  Accordingly, any such enterprise will be destroyed by God someday.


Having argued so, still it is profound that Judaists have been engaged in money business for centuries or since the start of rule by the Vatican in Europe in a large scale.  Higher living standards Judaists had been enjoying in Europe before WWII was indeed destroyed.  Though it is difficult to say that God used Nazis to destroy the money-contaminated Judaist society in Europe.

But, we can imagine that God might destroy the money-contaminated Judaist society in America by use of some group of people.  And in this case, due to globalization of economy, the whole world will face a financial and political crisis worse than the 2008 Financial Crisis triggered by Wall Street businesses.

Anyway, Karl Marx was born as a Judaist.  He could totally accept collapse of the European Christian society.  If Marx had found another mean to destroy the Christian Europe, he would have probably resorted to it.


Marxism, an anti-capitalism theory without love to neighbors or human beings, is however a historical fact.  It has been used for some purpose by God.  Truly without Marxism, much worse anti-Christ movements might have emerged in Europe.

Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) was a German philosopher, economist, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. Marx's work in economics laid the basis for much of the current understanding of labour and its relation to capital, and subsequent economic thought.[5][6][7][8] He published numerous books during his lifetime, the most notable being The Communist Manifesto (1848) and Das Kapital (1867–1894).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx#Legacy





**** **** ****




Mar 4:30 And he said, Whereunto shall we liken the kingdom of God? or with what comparison shall we compare it?
Mar 4:31 It is like a grain of mustard seed, which, when it is sown in the earth, is less than all the seeds that be in the earth:

"boldness they may speak thy word" - Love God; Don't Mind Your Own Unhappiness

Tokyo

Love God; Don't Mind Your Own Unhappiness

What does it mean to love God?

Christ Jesus said to love God but hate money.  Then, at least, we have to hate money to love God.  And then what?

Christ Jesus did not specify concrete acts as acts of loving God.  But nonetheless, He requested mankind to love God.  It suggests that mankind know what to love God is.

From the beginning if you deny existence of God, you don't love God.  But if you admit existence of God, you might think God has nothing to do with God.  Then you don't love God.  If you think there must be some relationship between God and mankind as a whole, you might still think that God never helps you personally.  Then you don't love God.

The right answer seems to be like this: From the beginning God created mankind so as to make them love Him.  The true reason why each of mankind lives is for him/her to love God.

In other word, God does not expect each of mankind to become happy.  God requests each person to love God without minding his/her happiness.  It is because it is God that created each of mankind.  However, can mankind accept this theory?  Can they sacrifice their happiness for love to God?

However, this theory explains why there are so many people who believe in God but die a terrible death each.  God can compensate any tragedies believers suffer in this world.  God can give unthinkable happiness in Heaven to anyone who lives a miserable life and dies a terrible death.

The fact that God never unconditionally saves unhappy followers in this world means that our loving of God must be done in one condition that it must be done even in unhappiness without interference of God.

There must be various ways of loving God.  You may be even a pious Buddhist or Hindu.  Some part of the essence of any religion must lead to God.  You don't have to be a Christian or a Muslim to love God.


In theory as God created this universe, mankind is just part of God.  To love ourselves means also to love part of God.  But, God has made it clear that we have to love God more than we love ourselves, part of God.




**** **** ****




Act 4:29 And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word,
Act 4:30 By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy holy child Jesus.

"after that the full corn in the ear" - Good or Evil Matters?

Tokyo

Good or Evil Matters?

The core of Judaism is its definition of good and evil.

According to Judaism, good is to protect the weak and evil is to abuse and exploit the weak.

The teaching of Christ Jesus is on the extension of this teaching.

But what is the definition of good and evil in American Christianity?

For example, it is common sense in China that there is no good but only evil outside a family.  Happiness of a family is good, and this happiness can be only obtained by joining evil outside the family.  This is not sound thinking.  China is not sound.

For Judaists, how much can they uphold the teaching about good and evil?  And how much can they extend this teaching, applying it to the wider world?

Christ Jesus did not teach to be good as much as possible, though He accused evil on many occasions.  He just saved the weak without saying it was an act of good.  And, He rather said that there was no one good except God.

If you think that you are good, you might not rely on God.  If you think you are not good, you might not rely on God, either.

Christ Jesus did not say that it is good to love God with all of one's heart and power.  But He said man must love God.  It is not matter of good or bad.  Mankind is not in a position where they can choose to be good or evil.  Mankind is in a state where they have to love good without relying on judgment on good or evil.

In this context, it is not humane.  Being good or evil is very humane.  But, mankind is not in a state where they are allowed to be humane.  First of all, they must love God beyond the human domain where they can be good or evil.

Anyway, you cannot be regarded as followers of Christ Jesus if you claim that you are good, since if you think you are good, you will be proud of yourself before you love God with all of your heart and strength.

Christ Jesus does not give any chance for Satan to capture His followers, since Satan will tell a man that he is good so that he doesn't need God any more.


If you love God and God makes you good, there will be no room for discussing good and bad, since you do just good under authority of God.  Put extremely, true followers of God will forget what is evil.  They might ask, "What is evil?  I only love God."



**** **** ****



Mar 4:28 For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself; first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the ear.
Mar 4:29 But when the fruit is brought forth, immediately he putteth in the sickle, because the harvest is come.

"saving Naaman the Syrian" - The American Testament or the Modern Roman Empire

Tokyo Bay

The American Testament or the Modern Roman Empire

In the Old Testament there are many descriptions about wars.

Though Christ Jesus never denied authority of the Old Testament, the Old Testament is full of descriptions of wars and civil wars.  Israelis fought for their survival, asking for help from God.

Christ Jesus also said that He was sent to Israelites.  And He gave warning not to go to foreign countries.  Christ Jesus was a patriot, first of all.  It is rather ambiguous whether He intended to save Europeans, Africans, and Asians by any sacrifice of Israelites.

On the other hand, Judaists thought they were different.  They were representatives of mankind.  They thought and still think that they can sacrifice other races and nations for them to achieve peace and prosperity.  Accordingly, they didn't and still don't mind killing their enemies in war.

This characteristic seems to be observed among Americans.

Americans think they are special.  They are representatives of mankind, they think.  So, they don't mind killing their enemies in war like Judaists.  In this context, Americans resemble Judaists, though it is not clear how much they love the Old Testament.

So, in my theory, Americans can be another Judaists in the next 2000 years.  They will someday start to write their own Testament.  They will justify their wars in the Testament, probably.

But the history might not give Americans such a long time.  If Americans are another Israelites, another Christ might appear.  And another Christianity might be established.  Then Americans will be in a difficult situation.

No Judaists today deny wars their ancestors were engaged in as well as wars they are engaged in.  No Americans will not deny any wars being made or having been made in their history.  Americans are really going to be another Judaists.  But it means that they will be destroyed someday like Israelites were in the war against the Roman Empire.

However, it is very unlikely that another Christ will emerge from Americans.  In this case, Americans might be another Romans.  Then, the whole scenario must be changed.

Anyway, Americans have to think about their significance of existence.




**** **** ****



Luk 4:27 And many lepers were in Israel in the time of Eliseus the prophet; and none of them was cleansed, saving Naaman the Syrian.

"So is the kingdom of God" - A New Religion for African Americans and All

Around Tokyo on Sunday Night

A New Religion for African Americans and All

If you were wrongly arrested for murder of someone you don't know, how much would you be upset?

Ricky Jackson, Wrongfully Convicted Of Murder, To Be Freed After 39 Years In Prison
 AP
Posted: 11/20/2014 11:14 am EST Updated: 11/21/2014 5:59 pm EST

CLEVELAND (AP) — A man who spent nearly four decades in prison after being convicted of murder is expected to be freed Friday after a witness confessed he lied as a boy when he told jurors he saw the deadly attack. 

Ricky Jackson had been seeking a new trial and sobbed loudly with his face in his hands as prosecutors dismissed his case Tuesday, The Plain Dealer (http://bit.ly/1vpfhwJ ) reported. 

"I can't believe this is over," Jackson, 57, said, thanking his supporters and his attorneys from the Ohio Innocence Project.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/20/ricky-jackson-free-innocent-wrongfully-convicted_n_6192358.html

So, The Tokyo Shimbun newspaper interviewed Mr. Jackson.

Mr. Jackson said that the life behind bars had been colorless and tasteless without hope.  He sought for salvation of his soul by relying on various religions, but only word of his mother sustained him: "Truth will liberate you."

Mr. Jackson also revealed that a certain detective had forced him to admit the murder by pushing a telephone book onto his face and punching him through it.

But when he was released from the prison, he looked up at the sky.  Mr. Jackson was happy to be able to see a wide sky as much as he wanted.

African Americans are very unique people.  They can be compared to Judaists in Europe.  Both the groups of people have been different from other major race, Europeans or European Americans, though most of Judaists look similar to Europeans except some part of genes.

However the core of Judaists is their religion.  Without Judaism, there would be no issues related to Judaists.  If no Judaists stick to their unique religion any more, who would care about them if they do not become Christians.

On the other hand, nobody minds what African Americans believe.  Their outlook only weighs.  Probably the social state of their ancestors would not even matter.  It is only their outlook.  The skin color is stronger than religion in giving an excuse for exercising segregation.

The issue of Judaists is related to our understanding of the past history.  It is a matter of finding the root of our civilization of today.  Modern global civilization and culture are supported by traditions symbolized by existence of Judaists.  The more we study our history, the more we will accept Judaists.

But, African Americans have almost nothing to do with the mainstream of the past history.  They came from Africa to be involved in the modern history on the stage of the US.  They have nothing to do with Abraham who lived 4000 years ago in Iraq.

Rather, African Americans are for the future.  For example, they can accept a new religion without betraying their ancestors.  

In other word, if God should give mankind a new religion, probably they will most earnestly accept it.  In this case, being African Americans should be very advantageous.

But how would European Americans and Judaists overlook African Americans following a new religion based on a tenet that asserts it intends to supersede Judaism and Christianity?

Anyway, if a new religion should prevail in America replacing Christianity and Judaism and the religion should be led by African Americans, their skin color would be a great symbol of this new religion all the Americans would accept.


To God, being regarded as black or white is just a laughable matter, in my view.




**** **** ****


Mar 4:26 And he said, So is the kingdom of God, as if a man should cast seed into the ground;
Mar 4:27 And should sleep, and rise night and day, and the seed should spring and grow up, he knoweth not how.