On the Same Green Planet like in the Same White Boat

On the Same Green Planet like in the Same White Boat

(Sur la même planète comme dans le même bateau)


The more you are given by the God, the more you are requested to give to others by the God.

In short, superiority of a race or a nation may be only allowed for in order to make others prosperous and peaceful.

When ancient Romans and the Roman Empire were found to fail in this context, their glorious days were terminated.

When faced with a disastrous global climate change and huge contamination of the nature, we have to prevent bad influences of the fall of other Roman Empires, even before the Messiah returns with the Army of Heaven.


SECTION I: WHO SUPPORT WHOM

A Japanese professor and a businessman studied this February on who supported “John McCain,” “Hillary,” “Obama,” and so on to publish the result on the Internet.

http://www.tkfd.or.jp/admin/files/SecondEdition.pdf

Probably, a lot of Japanese working in government agencies, businesses, the media, research institutes, and so on must be referring to it, since there are some names well known to Japanese through the media.

Example of supporters for “John McCain”:
Henry A. Kissinger, Alexander M. Haig Jr., George P. Shultz, James R. Schlesinger, Brent Scowcroft, Colin L. Powell, Richard Lee Armitage, John R. Bolton, Michael J. Green, Robert Zoellick, Joseph Lieberman, Howard H. Baker, Jeb Bush, etc.

Example of supporters for “Hillary”:
Madeleine K. Albright, William J. Perry, Wesley K. Clark, Robert E. Rubin, Lawrence H. Summers, Richard Gephardt, Magic Johnson, Andrew Young, Robert Kennedy Jr., Janet Reno, etc.

Example of supporters for “Obama”:
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Richard A. Clarke, John Kerry, Edward M. Kennedy, Tom Daschle, Paul Volcker, Robert De Niro, etc.


SECTION II: NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE PRODIGIOUS

Some Japanese critics write that the U.S. has been taking unbelievably poor measures and policies on purpose in diplomacy and economy.

They argue that the U.S. has been deliberately making irrationally a bad job and fumbling around to make its global position worsen and damaged in terms of politics and economy.

They may be right in observing movements of the US Government in diplomacy and economy at a certain angle; but they are wrong in assessing the ability of the US Government so high or high enough to masterfully fail on purpose so as to achieve a hidden goal.

They think that the US Government wants to end their uni-polar domination of the world the U.K. has been supporting and joining to compensate the downfall of the past British Empire.

They think that the US Government secretly wants to realize the multipolarized world, without being noticed by the U.K., so that the US Government comes to carry less burdens and enjoy less-troublesome isolationism for more security and stable prosperity.

But, those critics are wrong in their conclusion, since super rich Americans never give up exploiting people in the world and seizing wealth in the world.

The truth is that so much wealth makes super-rich Americans and the Government under their influence a kind of foolish, dull, slow, and easy.

In short, the "white men" in the U.S. have become very stupid despite, or rather due to, their too-huge accumulation of knowledge, power, and wealth.

They are not intentionally damaging or spoiling their past success and performance to achieve a covert target, but they are making their best, which however turns out to be so poor and inept, since super-rich Americans have become a kind of foolish, dull, slow, and easy due to the poison of wealth working on their nerve.

That is why the U.S. with scores of Nobel Prize Winners and super-billionaires cannot even locate and arrest Mr. Osama bin Laden while spending billions of dollars and mobilizing a million service-men and -women being engaged in six-year long War on Terror.

(Conversely, those "white men" have become too stupid to plan and carry out, say, the 9/11 conspiracy exquisitely laying the blame on AlQaeda. They cannot do it due to deterioration of their intelligence in a true sense.)


SECTION III: FALL OF ANOTHER ROMAN EMPIRE

Mr. Henry A. Kissinger has been discussing and writing many things just in order to make super-rich Americans richer.

Ms. Madeleine K. Albright has been discussing and writing many things just in order to make super-rich Americans richer.

Mr. Zbigniew Brzezinski has been discussing and writing many things just in order to make super-rich Americans richer.

But as they have become so ineffective due to the poison of wealth working on their nerves, the movements of the US Government under their influence have looked like a kind of self destruction.

This is completely matching the last phase of prosperity of the Roman Empire.

Japan and other countries, in addition to oil-producing Islamic countries as a recent example, have been buying US Treasury bonds and infusing a huge amount of dollars into the US money market, resulting in the skyrocketing expansion of limits of credence and credit accommodation to businesses and consumers in the U.S.

The US stock prices are still 30% higher than what they should be. US house prices are also still 30% higher than what they should be. US consumers are also still buying 30% more that they are allowed to buy based on real credit.

The issue is that this is not a result of adoption of highly-engineered schemes but a very simple scheme of forcing Japan and other countries to buy the US Treasury bonds in such a huge amount.

But, as this is so simple and easy, the minds and hearts of US leaders have become also so simple and easy, which is why super-rich Americans and the US Government look like making an irrational mess leading to self-destruction.

Again, the whole situation is very akin to the last phase of prosperity of the Roman Empire.


SECTION IV: OUT OF AMERICA TO GIVE WARNING

By the grace of God, we have some who have left America to come to Japan to give some warning.

For example, they say that super-rich Americans have brainwashed some Japanese elites, so that they can use such Japanese as their minions to seize wealth in Japan.

Conversely, it must be an old way they have applied to poor Americans.

So, the issue is whether the next US President will stop applying this method domestically and abroad: brainwashing some smart guys to use for exploiting a majority of ordinary tax payers, voters, consumers, and civilians in the U.S. as well as in the world.

And, if you continue to rely on such a method, you will eventually become a kind of foolish and stupid just like those "white men," which however looks unbelievably irrational so that some Japanese critics think that American leaders are failing on purpose for some profound reasons that in truth do not exist.



(Climate change is really going to punish mankind blindly engaged in economic activities led by super-rich Americans and Europeans as well as by the Chinese Communist Party.

When the nature of Japan came under an unbearable threat from too much economic and industrial activities, the Japanese economy was halted somehow, which is called Japan’s decade-long recession.

The US return to isolationism, even if any, must be discussed in this context.

Anyway, more and more people in the world nowadays look like wishing to come to Japan to learn something valuable in this context.

You can lead a full life in this context, if you are Japanese, which I don’t care to take note of on purpose.)










　　

JFK Jr. vs. “Obama”

JFK Jr. vs. “Obama”

(JFK Jr. ou Obama)



There are two major rivers flowing into the Bay of Tokyo: The Arakawa River and The Tama River.

The last Sunday I went to a park on the Tokyo Bay, which is situated at the river mouth of the Arakawa River.

Then, next day or so, a mad young man killed one person and injured seven with knives at the railroad station called “Arakawa-Oki” near Tokyo.

“Arakawa-Oki” means “off the river mouth of the Arakawa River.”

So, I have been writing on a hard issue this week to respond to the warning from Heaven, while your safety and security must be also assured by the God, if not by EEE Reporter.



SECTION I: PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH IN 1944

http://sub.replacement.fertility.rate.en.dark-legion.org/en/George%20Herbert%20Walker%20Bush
---
On September 2 , 1944 , Bush piloted one of four aircraft from VT-51 that attacked the Japanese installations on Chichi Jima.

For this mission his crew included Radioman Second Class John Delaney and Lieutenant Junior Grade William White, who substituted for Bush's regular gunner. During their attack four TBM Avenger s from VT-51 encountered intense antiaircraft fire. While starting the attack, Bush's aircraft was hit and his engine caught on fire. He completed his attack and released the bombs over his target, scoring several damaging hits. With his engine on fire, Bush flew several miles from the island, where he and one other crew member on the TBM Avenger bailed out of the aircraft. However, the other man's parachute did not open, and he fell to his death. It was never determined which man bailed out with Bush. Both Delaney and White were killed in action. While Bush waited four hours in his inflated raft , several fighters circled protectively overhead until he was rescued by the lifeguard submarine USS Finback (SS-230) .

For this action Bush received the Distinguished Flying Cross (USA).
---

Former President Mr. George H. W. Bush visited, in 2002, the Japanese island over which he had fought during WWII, having been well-received on the mainland Japan by then Prime Minister of Japan Mr. Jyunichiro Koizumi whose electorate includes Yokosuka City, a naval port city.

http://209.85.175.104/search?q=cache:5khS70bp4E4J:www-leland.stanford.edu/dept/SUL/wwwsul/test/depts/asrg/dailysum/Daily_Summary_2002/june_02/MH020618.doc&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1


SECTION II: JFK Jr. IN 1999

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/JFK_JR/jj.html
---
Having established that the government and the media have a prior (and quite deplorable) record of deliberate lies to the public, let us look at how the official story of the crash of John F. Kennedy Jr's plane evolved, and why it is suspect.

As first reported by United Press International, John F. Kennedy Jr. on approach to Martha's Vineyard in 8 mile visibility, was in radio contact with the ground, calmly informing them of his intentions to drop off a passenger before proceeding to Hyannis airport. Then, according to ABC News, JFK Jr's plane went into a steep dive, and crashed.

However, even before the wreckage was found, the story being put out in the media began to change. Gone was the previously reported radio conversation a calm JFK Jr. had with ground personnel just before the plane fell out of the sky, replaced by a declaration from the NTSB that JFK Jr. had not used his radio at all as he approached Martha's Vineyard. Gone also was the originally reported 8 mile visibility while the media began to hammer home the claim that Martha's Vineyard had been totally blanketed with a haze so heavy that pilots in the air would have been blind.

No sooner were the various stories put out but they quickly fell apart.
Here are some examples.

PROPAGANDA: JFK Jr. was lost.
FACT: When JFK Jr. radioed controllers on the Cape (as reported on Boston TV News) to announce his approach to Martha's Vineyard, radar showed him to be just where he stated he was and at the correct altitude for the approach.

PROPAGANDA: JK Jr. was in "over his head".
FACT: JFK Jr's conversational tone on the radio reveals that he was calm. He was not disoriented. He didn't ask for directions. He didn't indicate he had any problem at all. He clearly was confident he was going to find the airport and land.
---

John F. Kennedy Jr. died in a tragedy, while his father and uncle had also died in tragedies in 1960’s.


SECTION III: JFK Jr. VS. “HILLARY” AND “OBAMA”

1995 – JFK Jr. launched a magazine called “GEORGE” dedicated to politics.

(When I heard this news, I thought that JFK Jr. might be determined to throw light on the truth of the death of his father someday in real.)

1996 – Barack Obama entered the world of politics at a state level, as an Illinois senator.

1997 – Princess Diana was killed by a car accident in Paris together with a Muslim boy friend.

1999 – JFK Jr. was killed by an airplane accident together with his wife and her sister.

2000 – George W. Bush was elected as US President, defeating Al Gore.

– Hillary Rodham Clinton was elected as senator in New York.

2001 – AlQaeda carried out the 9/11 Terror in New York and Washington D.C.

2004 – George W. Bush was reelected as US President.

- Barack Obama entered the federal level political world as a US senator.

2008 - Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama are competing in the Presidential Primary.
---

If JFK Jr. had survived the 1999 air accident like Mr. George H. W. Bush in 1944, he must have been elected as a senator in New York in 2000 in lieu of “Hillary.”

If JFK Jr. had survived the 1999 air accident like Mr. George H. W. Bush in 1944, he must have been running in 2008 US Presidential Election in lieu of “Obama.”

If the 9/11 Terror had been prevented, JFK Jr. might have been elected as US President in 2004 in lieu of Mr. George W. Bush.

Nonetheless, there is an opposite view:
http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/01/28/jfk-jr/
---
Monday, January 28, 2008…

Today, JFK Jr. would be the same age as Barack Obama. The two men were born only about 8 months apart. Instead of someone who reminds people of John F. Kennedy, could we have had the real deal?

JFK Jr. never showed much academic achievement. He didn’t have a great academic record and it took him three tries to pass the New York bar exam. If he’d entered politics, he might have been a Democratic George W. Bush, a scion of a rich family who wouldn’t have amounted to much without his connections and didn’t want to work very hard (but without W’s scary messianic certainty and faux-hokiness).

But perhaps not.

We’ll never know…


[Comment:…I doubt that he’d have felt the need to enter politics himself. Though I’m surprised his sister has never done so.]
---

***************************

The Chicago area has been always a key to movements of the Kennedys, good or bad.

The Kennedy clan reportedly accumulated wealth through their connection with the Mafia in Chicago.

JFK reportedly won the Presidential Election in 1960 by securing a decisive support from voters in Chicago, Illinois.

Some gangsters, reportedly involved in the JFK assassination, were mostly from Chicago, including Jack Ruby.

And, 40 years after the JFK assassination, the things are still going on along the old line:
Mr. Barack Obama was not a politician at the federal level in 2001 and 2003, though he was against the US invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 as a politician working in Illinois.

Mr. Barack Obama recently got a decisive support for his primary-election campaign from the sister of the late John F. Kennedy Jr. and the brother of JFK.

This sequence of events and accidents does not seem very positive for me.

It is because Jesus Christ said not to have anything to do with something unclean or doubtful.

That is why I don't join the “Obama” boom.



(It is so terrible to write about violence and conspiracy.

However, we are living in a far better condition than the one, say, in Cambodia.

Compared with Cambodia under the mad communist regime after the Vietnam War, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Sudan today still do not look abandoned by Angels.

Or can you imagine how people were reporting news in the era of the Vietnam War and the Cambodian tragedy?

You had better ask Mr. John McCain.

Indeed, it is not an easy job to be a holy reporter or a holy newscaster, isn't it?)




　　　



　　

Sources of Conspiracy or Representatives of Mankind?

Sources of Conspiracy or Representatives of Mankind?

(Les sources de conspiration ou les représentants de l'humanité?)



One of main incentives of samurai warriors in being engaged in wars and battles, especially in the 16th century's civil war period in Japan, was of course wealth, since Japan had been a country of abundant gold of high quality as Marco Polo reported.

Today one of main incentives of politicians in the world in being engaged in elections is of course wealth, since the world is still in peril of Devil’s temptation.


SECTION I: “Hillary” and the Rothschilds

Everybody in office of governments, businesses, the media, universities, NGOs, and religious bodies, or palaces is talking about China and India, as new sources of wealth or global warming.

Ms. Lynn Forester de Rothschild is one of them:
http://www.portfolio.com/views/columns/the-world-according-to/2007/10/05/An-interview-with-Lady-de-Rothschild
---

L.R.: [Laughs.] Well Evelyn was the closest that we got to agriculture. He's a gentleman farmer in England, so he was our closest link to agriculture. No, that was a very unexpected result. But in that process that I was describing to you, one of the first questions to people would be: So what is the next opportunity? B.P.O.-business processing operation-that's already well-known. Outsourcing and technology are well-known. My area, which was technology and telecom, was already very highly capitalized even back in 2003. So what's next? What's next, what's needed, and what's big? And from different sources, consultants, businesspeople, we would be given this series of facts about the agricultural sector-that 40 percent of all produce in India goes to waste.

L.G.: Right.

L.R.: That China has 60 percent of the arable land of India, but it's 40 percent more productive because of technology. That India is the largest producer of fruits, No. 1 in the world, No. 2 in vegetables, and has only 1 percent of the export market. So, those are all really big factors that we know how to fix. You fix them with technology on the ground, with cold storage and infrastructure on the ground. And if the retail sector isn't ready to buy higher-quality fruit and vegetables, which I always thought they would be-but three years ago, it was less obvious than now-you could export them and be the lowest-cost exporter.

L.G.: So you can export them to parts of Asia and Europe?

L.R.: Yes, and Japan.
---

EEE - You had better remember that the Rothschilds have been well known for their business in the wine industry. Two families, in England and France, of the clan even competed with each other for business hegemony over wine. So, it may be their tradition to focus on plants, though Ms. Lynn Forester de Rothschild is said to have gathered wealth in the IT business:
---

L.G.: Absolutely. So let me just ask you about [television and wireless mogul] John Kluge, who was a big influence on your early business life, when you'd been practicing as a lawyer. How did you meet him, what was his influence on you, and what did you learn from him?

L.R.: I was a lawyer at Simpson Thacher when John Kluge was the first in the world to figure out that cellular telephones were going to change the world. And he was hiring in that area. Most people, including me, had no idea what cellular was—it sounded like a biotech idea. But he asked me to come in as executive vice president for development.
...

L.R.: [Laughs.] I don't know why! So he talked to me about it, and he gave me this job. I was all of, I don't know, 28 or 29, I was pretty young, and then John created this amazing footprint in America. And people forget that he was the richest man in America before people heard of Bill Gates.

L.G.: This was before the internet, before people had heard of the internet too.

L.R.: Exactly, and so when John sold to Southwest Bell —he had already sold his television business to Rupert Murdoch to create Fox —I was not going to work for Southwest Bell. So I said to John, "I really don't know if I can do it, but I want to be an entrepreneur. I want my own show." And he said, "I know you can do it, and I know you'll be very good at it." I said, "Boy, you know, I want a net worth of $40 million."
...

L.G.: I see, and how did you make your first hundred million? You were involved in a cell-phone company in Puerto Rico, and then you had the foresight to buy up frequencies in major cities, which you later were able to sell for a premium. Is that basically it? How did you have the insight to do all that?

L.R.: Well, uh, the Latin American company located in Puerto Rico was just an obvious buy at the time; it was such a good deal. The licenses, I was actually granted the licenses, and I got them for free.

L.G.: You got them for free? All the better.

L.R.: Yeah, exactly. I realized that frequencies were a limited resource and that there would be a big business at some time around that, and so I was the first person to apply in the United States for wireless-broadband licenses. And yeah, I sold them for a lot of money.

L.G.: How much pure luck was involved? Or did you have a special insight? Obviously you thought it was obvious, but other people obviously didn't; otherwise they would've done it. To what do you attribute that?

L.R.: I think a lot of it was that I was lucky. I think I do understand where value might be when people are overlooking it. I never had the money to buy what was popular. I've always had to start from, you know, lack of capital. So I needed to have better ideas, and I've been really lucky in focusing on overlooked areas.
---

EEE - So, a young woman met the richest man in America before people heard of Bill Gates and her life changed decisively riding on the crest of the new telecommunications business boom. It was when the unbelievable thing happened in the U.S.: the corporate breakup of ATT. When JFK was assassinated, the Vietnam War was going on, the Watergate scandal hit Richard Nixon, and Ronald Reagan started his Administration, ATT was the only company in the U.S. that offered telecommunications services. Indeed, the split of ATT produced one rich woman as a by-product. And she is now backing Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton:
---

L.G.: Let me ask you, when your fellow capitalists come to you and express worries and fears about what Hillary Clinton will do in terms of raising taxes on capital gains and hedge fund operators, and income taxes, what do you tell them to reassure them that Hillary will be good for business?

L.R.: First of all, Hillary will be good for America. And so if we care about our country —which all of my fellow capitalists do —we'll be very pleased that she's president. And second of all, if we look at what is best for the economy, remember, she is a Clinton, and our economy under Clinton was strong, dynamic, productive, exciting. And the same kinds of people who advised Bill Clinton will be around Hillary Clinton. And she understands the importance of the business community, and it's not going to be about raising taxes or doing any one specific thing. It's going to be, What is in the best interest of all Americans? And I think if history is our guide, we've had stronger economies, more wealth creation, under Democratic presidents than we have under Republican presidents. So I don't understand why all my capitalist friends aren't Democrats.…

L.G.: There's a big fundraiser on October 17 in Washington, and you're listed as one of the hosts-the National Women's Finance Summit. Will you be there for that?

L.R.: Yes, yes, I will definitely be there for that.

L.G.: And I noticed that all the thousand-dollar seats are sold, but you can still get some $2,300 V.I.P. seats. Do you want to try to sell any to our readers now?

L.R.: [Laughs.] I would strongly advise your readers to snatch up whatever is there. It's going to be a spectacular day. That event is quintessentially Hillary Clinton. Look at what she's doing. She is, first of all, empowering women in a way that we could have only dreamed about when we graduated from college. But that's secondary to bringing her foreign-policy team, her economics team, her political team, herself to educate everyone about what she believes. They're all going to take whatever questions we have. She's going to listen; they're going to listen. She can't be there the whole day, but it's so quintessentially Hillary. Politics is so boring, where they ask for your money, you get a glass of cheap wine and a biscuit, and then when you say, "You know, I have an idea about health care or I have an idea about inheritance tax," nobody wants to listen to you, because what they really want is your money. Hillary is the opposite. Obviously there aren't enough hours in the day to listen to every idea, but she is listening, and she is responding.
---

EEE - And then, she became a Rothschild:
---

When 67-year-old British banking scion Sir Evelyn Rothschild first set eyes on 44-year-old Lynn Forester at the 1998 Bilderberg conference—the matchmaker was none other than Henry Kissinger—she was already a woman of major means.



SECTION II: “Bill” and the Rockefellers

Mr. Bill Clinton had a close family friend in the Rockefellers:
http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2006/07/21/News/336952.html
---
LITTLE ROCK - Dignitaries that included former President Bill Clinton attended Thursday's final public service for billionaire Lt. Gov. Win Rockefeller, but it was Rockefeller's association with the Boy Scouts, his love of family and his ability to talk to regular folks that marked the occasion…

Rockefeller was a billionaire and great-grandson of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller. He also was the son of a former Arkansas governor, the late Winthrop Rockefeller.

The elder Rockefeller was governor when a young student from Hot Springs named Bill Clinton was awarded a Rhodes scholarship. The governor invited the young Clinton to the family ranch at Petit Jean Mountain near Morrilton after Clinton received the honor in 1969. There he met Win Rockefeller, Clinton said in an impromptu news conference after the funeral services had ended and the crowds dispersed. "I was 22 and he was 20," Clinton said. "We spent the whole evening together and were friends ever since." Clinton, a Democrat, would later appoint Rockefeller, a Republican, to the State Police Commission in 1981. He served there until 1995.

Rockefeller was a man who could put aside political differences and believe "we should all go forward together," Clinton said. "He always treated people with humanity and respect, and was clearly proud of his life," Clinton said.
---

So, Mr. Bill Clinton probably still has a close family friend in the Rockefellers.


SECTION III: “Obama” and Churchill

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/26/2199175.htm
---
US presidential hopeful Barack Obama is a distant relative not only of President George W Bush but also of wartime British prime minister Winston Churchill, according to US researchers.
---

As I posted the article “From 1776 To 2008 Through 1997 and 2001” on February 14, 2008, Winston Churchill’s son married Pamela Digby, America’s ambassador to France appointed by Mr. Bill Clinton, whose aunt was the wife of a Rothschild.

“Obama,” “Hillary,” “Bill Clinton,” the Rothschilds, and the Rockefellers are all related and associated in a sense.

*************************************

Simply, that is why I am telling you that what you need is the US Religious Revolution but not the dreaming of US political renovation.

It is because no one regards Jesus Christ as a political player but a religious figure even in modern critical communities.

And, truly Jesus Christ said: You cannot serve both the God and wealth.

If you don’t serve God well, how can you serve the people the God kindly created?



(There are many Japanese who are interested in the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, since the Bank of Japan and the Imperial Family are believed to have a close tie, in whatever sense, with those super rich clans based in the U.S. and the U.K.

Before the battle in Waterloo between Napoleon and the U.K., the Rothschilds had no decisive financial power in the U.K. and Europe.

Before the US Civil War, the Rockefellers had no decisive financial power in the U.S. and the world.

And, before the breakdown of ATT, Microsoft, Yahoo, or Google had no chances for subsistence, if they had existed then.

They cannot defeat history in which they may be just playing minor roles.

So, choose your president based on your view on history but not on the temporary financial power those candidates can rely on, since China and India are gaining momentum, good or bad, through the framework against the West Japan has established as the only major non-Christian military and economic power of the world class even before WWII.

Her Majesty in any kingdom should not succumb to their influence, as my advice if you are close to any including the Vatican.)










　　

The Fundamental Secret to Be True Master

The Fundamental Secret to Be True Master

(Le secret fondamental à un vrai maître)



Who is the Ambassador to Mankind from Heaven?

You or the Messiah?

Or “John McCain,” “Hillary,” or “Barack Hussein Obama?”


SECTION I: US GOLF BOOM DECLINED

In early 1990’s there were 2,000 golf courses in Japan while there were 12,000 in the U.S.

Then by the early 21st century the number of golf courses in the U.S. grew up to be 16,000.

However, now it is said that US golf course owners and related companies are seeing a decline of the golf boom with 2.6 million people going for golf 25 times or more per year in 2005 despite 6.9 million people having done so in 2000, according to a certain golf association of the U.S.

You may think it is irrelevant, but I feel that the Roman Empire must have also entered its decline phase with such a decline of the number of citizens going to some sort of entertainment or sports.


SECTION II: US BALANCE AGGRAVATED

When President Mr. Bill Clinton achieved budget surplus in late 1990’s and further presented a forecast, in July 2000, of accumulated financial surplus reaching $5610 billion during the fiscal years between 2002 and 2011, the U.S. must have been at its peak of material prosperity as the only super-power on the earth.

But now, the U.S. has a budget deficit of $200 billion in fiscal 2007 and an external deficit of $810 billion, while Japan and China have $1 trillion foreign reserves, respectively.


SECTION III: ”OBAMA” VS. “TIGER”

There is an interesting opinion on Mr. Barack Obama and Mr. Tiger Woods: “The Orange Grove: Obama is no Tiger Woods”

http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/obama-woods-tiger-1999861-black-first
---
The immense cross-cultural appeal of Tiger Woods is based on many aspects of his profile (foremost among them, of course, is that, unlike Obama, he has already transformed his incredible potential into actual accomplishments). While at first glance Barack Obama appears to possess many of those same qualities, when you scratch below the surface it becomes clear that his resemblance to Tiger Woods is literally only skin deep.
---

And some comments to this opinion:
---
Obviously OC Register readers have reached some kind of consensus that Hillary Clinton is not going to be the Democratic nominee, since they have now chosen to dump on Senator Obama. John Ziegler has already found a convenient way, which -- by comparing him with Tiger Wood -- has given him a way to figure out that Obama is playing the "racial victim" card…(by islander)
---

Islander - It's Woods not Wood. By the way - anybody can guess which group you belong to, the destroyers I'm sure. Also I'm not just dumping on Obama. The point was private citizens produce, politicans plunder…(by thormod)
---

“Obama” is good at talking about ideal; “Tiger” is good at playing golf.

And, the both may be good at serving US citizens as the President or not at all, since only the God knows.


SECTION IV: TRUE MASTER

If you are good at speaking ideal, you can be rich and successful by relying on the ability.

If you are good at playing golf, you can be rich and successful by relying on the ability.

However, you cannot be truly matured, if you become rich and successful only by relying on your advantage and merit.

You cannot even learn how losers feel and think while they are being defeated by you in your home ground.

You cannot be truly called master if you do not learn and experience the feeling and thinking of losers, since Jesus Christ truly loves such losers.

You cannot even learn what precious merits exist in other fields where you are a poor player.

You can be a champion in your home ground easily, but you cannot in other’s home ground. “Barack” cannot be easily a champion in golf; “Tiger” cannot be easily a champion in politics.

Indeed, you cannot be truly called a master if you do not try to master what you are not good at at all, since the God often requests you to leave what you are good at and get engaged in what you are not good at.

In short, “Barack” and “Tiger” are not true masters at all, being viewed from this standpoint.

They look like being just small-time champions who have ever only fought in their home ground with just one-side knowledge of being a winner but not being a loser.

****************************

“Barack” may be elected as the US President, while the U.S. has started to follow suit of the Roma Empire declining.

“Tiger” may become a winner in other championship games or title matches, while the U.S. has started to follow suit of the Roma Empire declining.

But, if “Tiger” challenges to be elected as the US President, and “Barack” challenges to become a winner in golf championship games or golf title matches, the U.S. may grow up to be a more glorious state than the Roman Empire.

It is because Mr. Tyson had to experience a complete defeat to get matured at the age of 39, and Mr. Foreman had to be a complete winner at the age of 45 to be true master.




(If you are good at becoming rich, challenge to become poor.

If you are good at becoming a winner in any competition in business, challenge to become a loser.

This is how you can become a true master, since devils tried to tempt Jesus Christ to enjoy being rich and being a winner, though Jesus Christ rejected them all to prove He is the Messiah.

Now, you know why you have to respect poor people, losers, and other man who married a poor or a failed woman, since they are rather closer to a true master than you are.)



[as my humble blessing to you, if any...]

In Terms of Race, Languages, and Religion

In Terms of Race, Languages, and Religion

(En termes de race, de langue et de religion)



SECTION I: CHINA
---
China is called Zhongguo in Chinese. The character zhōng means "middle" or "central," while guó means "state". The term is commonly translated into English as "Middle Kingdom", but is also sometimes translated as "Central Kingdom".
…
English and many other languages use various forms of the name "China" and the prefix "Sino-" or "Sin-". These forms are thought to derive from the name of the Qin Dynasty that first unified the country (221–206 BCE). The pronunciation of "Qin" is similar to "Chin", which is considered the possible root of the word "China"
---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China

China is called usually “Chu-Goku” in Japanese, since “Chu” means “central” and “Goku” (Koku or Kuni in other cases) means a “country” in Japanese.

It is because Han Chinese (the core of contemporary Chinese) first established their city state in the Central Plain of the Chinese Continent fairly long time ago, say, 4000 years ago.

(The vast majority of Han Chinese — over 1.2 billion — live in the People's Republic of China (PRC), where they constitute about 92% of its population. Within the PRC, Han Chinese are the majority in every province, municipality, and autonomous region except for the autonomous regions of Xinjiang (41% as of 2000) and Tibet (6% as of 2000).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Chinese )


SECTION II: MANCHU
---
The Manchu people are a Tungusic people who originated in Manchuria (today's Northeastern China). During their rise in the seventeenth century, along with the help of Ming rebels (such as general Wu Sangui), they conquered the Ming Dynasty and founded the Qing Dynasty, which ruled China until its abolition in 1911 after the Xinhai Revolution, which established a republican government in its place.

The Manchu ethnicity have largely been assimilated with the Han Chinese. The Manchu language is almost extinct, now spoken only among a small number of elderly in remote rural areas of northeastern China and a few scholars; there are around ten thousand speakers of Sibe (Xibo), a Manchu dialect spoken in the Ili region of Xinjiang.
---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchu


SECTION III: TIBETANS
---
The Government of Tibet in Exile claims that the number of Tibetans has fallen from 6,330,567 to 5.4 million since 1959, while the government of the People's Republic of China claims that the number of Tibetans has risen from 2.7 million to 5.4 million since 1954. The SIL Ethnologue documents an additional 125,000 Tibetan exiles living in India, 60,000 in Nepal, and 4,000 in Bhutan.

Tibetan exile groups estimate the death toll in Tibet since the invasion of the People's Liberation Army in 1950 to be 1,200,000
…
Chinese and "proto-Tibeto-Burman" may have split sometime before 4000 BC, when the Chinese began growing millet in the Yellow River valley while the Tibeto-Burmans remained nomads; Tibet split from Burma circa 500. The Tibetan language is a member of the Tibeto-Burman branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family.
---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_people


SECTION IV: UYGHUR PEOPLE
---
Uyghurs live mainly in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China, where they are the largest ethnic group, together with Han Chinese, Hui, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz and Russians.
…
Uyghur history is the story of an obscure nomadic tribe from the Altai Mountains rising to challenge the Chinese Empire and ultimately becoming the diplomatic arm of the Mongol invasion
…
The Chinese government often imprisons Uyghur nationalists and has executed some individuals. On February 9, 2007, Ismail Semed was executed by the Peoples Republic of China for "attempting to split the motherland". In March 2006, Huseyin Celil, a Canadian Muslim religious leader was arrested and later convicted for “separatist activities” and sentenced to life imprisonment because of his alleged links to groups seeking independence for Xinjiang.
---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_people

*********

If the Empire of Japan had not stood up against invasion by the West in the late 19th century, East Asia should have been in ever-lasting turmoil and debacle as the then Chinese Imperial Dynasty proved unbelievably powerless to Western colonists, including the Russian Empire.

(In short, without the samurai tradition in Japan, Asia today, including India, China, and Japan itself, must look no different from Africa and Latin America before WWII, thus resulting in no economic super-power Japan and no economic success of Korea, Taiwan, Thai, Malaysia, Singapore, China, India, and other Asian countries, the fact of which however has been neglected by Western economists and pundits on purpose.)

As India was colonized by Britons, Indochina was colonized by French, and Central/South Americas were colonized by Spanish and Portuguese, East Asia as a whole must have been put under the hegemony of the West, while so many US whaling boats were rampaging about in the West Pacific Ocean possessively.

Yet, the Empire of Japan tried to assimilate Manchu, Koreans, and Taiwanese, which turned out to be arrogance the God did not permit.

Then, the Empire of Japan was defeated in WWII, losing its territories in Manchuria, Korea, and Taiwan as well as islands in the South Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Okhotsk.

The same thing must apply to contemporary China in terms of their hegemony over Tibetans and Uyghurs as well as their posing threat to Taiwan people.

But you should also note that Japan, Korea, and Mongolians (and Manchu) belong to a different language group(s) from that Chinese and Tibetans belong to, so that the former has in general a strong sense of distinction from the latter (though Japan uses the Kanji letters similar to, and originally adopted from, Chinese letters).

In terms of the religion, Communist Han Chinese must not have dominance over Buddhist Tibetans and Islamic Uyghurs.

It is just like European Americans must not have dominance over African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Native Americans, including Hawaiians, in my personal humble view.



(Now, cherry blossoms in Tokyo have started to bloom.

I may go out to take some pictures today, since they must be still white-tinged as an early mode of its bloom.)


“God bought you for a price. So use your bodies for God’s glory.”

(Gott hat euch als sein Eigentum erworben)





　　

Conspiracies Routine and Holy

Conspiracies Routine and Holy

(Conspirations de routine et des saints)



It was a hard day yesterday for me, since the sea was not green and the submarine was not yellow.


SECTION I: JFK in 1963 and Terror Victims in 2001

It is the “JFK Assassination” that has made some people believe in the “9/11 Terror Conspiracy Theory” that claims that 3,000 people were killed in New York and Washington D.C. on Sept. 11, 2001, by President Mr. George W. Bush through his plot under the disguise of Islamic terror.

The former is a result of a certain true conspiracy; yet the latter is a combined result of an act of true terror and an act of negligence of the US Government looking for an excuse to launch a military operation against Saddam Hussein’s regime of Iraq.

In order to completely persuade those who still believe in the “9/11 Terror Conspiracy Theory,” we have to probably completely explain how the “JFK Assassination” was planned, carried out, and abused later by whom.

But, commonsense should tell you that it is strange that those who blame President Mr. George W. Bush as a true culprit for the 9/11 Terror never try to study the past and present acts of terror AlQaeda and other terrorists have conducted not only in Iraq and Afghanistan after the US military invasion, but also on a USS naval ship, US embassies in East Africa, US military installations in Saudi Arabia and Palestine, hotels and resort facilities in Egypt and Indonesia, and 1993 World Trade Center bombing, in addition to terror on transportation in Madrid, London, and Mumbai, all of which were engineered in these decades.

It is further strange that AlQaeda has never announced that the 9/11 Terror was an act of the Bush Administration, which could be of course the most powerful attack on the US Government.

In short, the “JFK Assassination” and the “9/11 Terror” are two different things in its essence.

A pin-point assassination and a mass-murder terror act are two different things in its essence, in most cases to which our issue belongs.


SECTION II: Routine Conspiracy

If you really hate an act of conspiracy, you must tackle the routine conspiracy nurtured in the US National Election.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html

In summary, the turnouts of voters in the US Presidential Elections are as follows:
2004 ---- 55.3%
2000 ---- 51.3
1996 ---- 49.1
1992 -- --55.1
1988 ---- 50.1
1984 ---- 53.1
1980 ---- 52.6
1976 ---- 53.6
1972 ---- 55.2
1968 ---- 60.8
1964 ---- 61.9
1960 ---- 63.1

(The voting rates in the midterm electios are further smaller.)

You had better find a conspiracy in the above clear figures rather than in vague pictures used as a proof for the “9/11 Terror Conspiracy Theory.”

Conspiracies have long been carried out far before the September 11, 2001.

Taking into consideration the freedom and ability to take action ordinary Americans are enjoying, it is unbelievable that only such low rates have been recorded in the US Presidential Elections.

Somebody must prevent US citizens from going and voting; otherwise, somebody must have manipulated the counting on votes in their favor, which must be being done routinely to date.

It is because “typically in the United States, about 3 percent of the vote is voided, just thrown away, not recorded.”
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/kerry_won.php


SECTION III: “Gore Won!”; “Kerry Won!”

We saw this in Florida in 2000. Exit polls showed Gore with a plurality of at least 50,000, but it didn't match the official count. That's because the official, Secretary of State Katherine Harris, excluded 179,855 spoiled votes.
…
The majority of ballots thrown out (there will be nearly 2 million tossed out from Tuesday's election) will have been cast by African American and other minority citizens.
…
(In 2004) the total of Ohio votes discarded reached a democracy-damaging 1.96 percent. The machines produced their typical loss—that's 110,000 votes—overwhelmingly Democratic.
…
New Mexico reported in the last race a spoilage rate of 2.68 percent, votes lost almost entirely in Hispanic, Native American and poor precincts—Democratic turf. From Tuesday's vote, assuming the same ballot-loss rate, we can expect to see 18,000 ballots in the spoilage bin.
…
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/kerry_won.php

As exit polls in Florida in 2000 suggested, the winner of the 2000 US Presidential Election must be Mr. Al Gore.

As exit polls in Ohio and New Mexico in 2004 suggested, the winner of the 2004 US Presidential Election must be Mr. John Kerry.


SECTION IV: The 2008 Winner Already Decided?

I hope that some people would stop arguing the “9/11 Terror Conspiracy Theory” but concentrate on the real conspiracy that the 2008 Presidential Election winner has been already chosen and decided by very rich Americans.
**************

Indeed, one day some Chinese may come to you, saying that they are an independent and secret Chinese organization fighting against super-rich Europeans and Americans who managed and plotted the 9/11 Terror.

Those Chinese would say that Asia and the world would become peaceful if China annexes Taiwan, controls the Korean Peninsula and the Indochina Peninsula as well as Tibet and Central Asia.

They would encourage you to further study the 9/11 Terror conspiracy planned and carried out by the Bush Administration.

They would, then, ask you to tell Japanese to respect China.

But, first of all, there cannot be any independent or secret Chinese organization that can operate effectively inside and outside China, since the Chinese Communist Party will not allow existence of such a political organization.

It is the nature of one-party dictatorship.

It is truly a black joke that a Chinese Communist Party agent is encouraging some Americans and others to believe the 9/11 Terror conspiracy allegedly driven by the Bush Administration, while China has openly usurped Tibet.



(Last night, I saw first on TV how “Mao” won the female figure skating world championship contested in Sweden a few days ago. In the Sunday night news show, I then saw her having slipped, falling on the ice rink, sliding on the belly to a fence, but coming back with determination to perform beautifully during the rest of her time on the rink.

I don't know if “Mao” some minutes before her appearance on the rink saw her senior rival “Miki,” the defending champion, having retired due to persistent injury on the leg in the middle of her performance, since I don't know the order of their performance.

But, if "Miki" had been first, it must have raised a sense of complicated fear and pressure for the victory in the Japanese teen aged girl, skating-queen hopeful "Mao."

But, when she fell on the ice, “Mao” must have thought that the two Japanese girls failing miserably in the world championship in Sweden must hurt the dignity of Japan.

“Mao” must bear herself honorably for the sake of not only herself and “Miki” but also the Japanese.

Yet, if "Mao" had skated out before "Miki," she still must have need strong motivation as a Japanese heroine as well as super confidence in her skating ability to continue the performance after such a disaster.

Then, the God helped her win the championship, since "I was surprised myself," Asada said.

http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/news/story?id=3304057

This is truly a holy conspiracy, isn't it?)



“Have Salt of Friendship”

(Sie müssen Salz der Freundschaft)