Sources of Conspiracy or Representatives of Mankind?
(Les sources de conspiration ou les représentants de l'humanité?)
One of main incentives of samurai warriors in being engaged in wars and battles, especially in the 16th century's civil war period in Japan, was of course wealth, since Japan had been a country of abundant gold of high quality as Marco Polo reported.
Today one of main incentives of politicians in the world in being engaged in elections is of course wealth, since the world is still in peril of Devil’s temptation.
SECTION I: “Hillary” and the Rothschilds
Everybody in office of governments, businesses, the media, universities, NGOs, and religious bodies, or palaces is talking about China and India, as new sources of wealth or global warming.
Ms. Lynn Forester de Rothschild is one of them:
http://www.portfolio.com/views/columns/the-world-according-to/2007/10/05/An-interview-with-Lady-de-Rothschild
---
L.R.: [Laughs.] Well Evelyn was the closest that we got to agriculture. He's a gentleman farmer in England, so he was our closest link to agriculture. No, that was a very unexpected result. But in that process that I was describing to you, one of the first questions to people would be: So what is the next opportunity? B.P.O.-business processing operation-that's already well-known. Outsourcing and technology are well-known. My area, which was technology and telecom, was already very highly capitalized even back in 2003. So what's next? What's next, what's needed, and what's big? And from different sources, consultants, businesspeople, we would be given this series of facts about the agricultural sector-that 40 percent of all produce in India goes to waste.
L.G.: Right.
L.R.: That China has 60 percent of the arable land of India, but it's 40 percent more productive because of technology. That India is the largest producer of fruits, No. 1 in the world, No. 2 in vegetables, and has only 1 percent of the export market. So, those are all really big factors that we know how to fix. You fix them with technology on the ground, with cold storage and infrastructure on the ground. And if the retail sector isn't ready to buy higher-quality fruit and vegetables, which I always thought they would be-but three years ago, it was less obvious than now-you could export them and be the lowest-cost exporter.
L.G.: So you can export them to parts of Asia and Europe?
L.R.: Yes, and Japan.
---
EEE - You had better remember that the Rothschilds have been well known for their business in the wine industry. Two families, in England and France, of the clan even competed with each other for business hegemony over wine. So, it may be their tradition to focus on plants, though Ms. Lynn Forester de Rothschild is said to have gathered wealth in the IT business:
---
L.G.: Absolutely. So let me just ask you about [television and wireless mogul] John Kluge, who was a big influence on your early business life, when you'd been practicing as a lawyer. How did you meet him, what was his influence on you, and what did you learn from him?
L.R.: I was a lawyer at Simpson Thacher when John Kluge was the first in the world to figure out that cellular telephones were going to change the world. And he was hiring in that area. Most people, including me, had no idea what cellular was—it sounded like a biotech idea. But he asked me to come in as executive vice president for development.
...
L.R.: [Laughs.] I don't know why! So he talked to me about it, and he gave me this job. I was all of, I don't know, 28 or 29, I was pretty young, and then John created this amazing footprint in America. And people forget that he was the richest man in America before people heard of Bill Gates.
L.G.: This was before the internet, before people had heard of the internet too.
L.R.: Exactly, and so when John sold to Southwest Bell —he had already sold his television business to Rupert Murdoch to create Fox —I was not going to work for Southwest Bell. So I said to John, "I really don't know if I can do it, but I want to be an entrepreneur. I want my own show." And he said, "I know you can do it, and I know you'll be very good at it." I said, "Boy, you know, I want a net worth of $40 million."
...
L.G.: I see, and how did you make your first hundred million? You were involved in a cell-phone company in Puerto Rico, and then you had the foresight to buy up frequencies in major cities, which you later were able to sell for a premium. Is that basically it? How did you have the insight to do all that?
L.R.: Well, uh, the Latin American company located in Puerto Rico was just an obvious buy at the time; it was such a good deal. The licenses, I was actually granted the licenses, and I got them for free.
L.G.: You got them for free? All the better.
L.R.: Yeah, exactly. I realized that frequencies were a limited resource and that there would be a big business at some time around that, and so I was the first person to apply in the United States for wireless-broadband licenses. And yeah, I sold them for a lot of money.
L.G.: How much pure luck was involved? Or did you have a special insight? Obviously you thought it was obvious, but other people obviously didn't; otherwise they would've done it. To what do you attribute that?
L.R.: I think a lot of it was that I was lucky. I think I do understand where value might be when people are overlooking it. I never had the money to buy what was popular. I've always had to start from, you know, lack of capital. So I needed to have better ideas, and I've been really lucky in focusing on overlooked areas.
---
EEE - So, a young woman met the richest man in America before people heard of Bill Gates and her life changed decisively riding on the crest of the new telecommunications business boom. It was when the unbelievable thing happened in the U.S.: the corporate breakup of ATT. When JFK was assassinated, the Vietnam War was going on, the Watergate scandal hit Richard Nixon, and Ronald Reagan started his Administration, ATT was the only company in the U.S. that offered telecommunications services. Indeed, the split of ATT produced one rich woman as a by-product. And she is now backing Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton:
---
L.G.: Let me ask you, when your fellow capitalists come to you and express worries and fears about what Hillary Clinton will do in terms of raising taxes on capital gains and hedge fund operators, and income taxes, what do you tell them to reassure them that Hillary will be good for business?
L.R.: First of all, Hillary will be good for America. And so if we care about our country —which all of my fellow capitalists do —we'll be very pleased that she's president. And second of all, if we look at what is best for the economy, remember, she is a Clinton, and our economy under Clinton was strong, dynamic, productive, exciting. And the same kinds of people who advised Bill Clinton will be around Hillary Clinton. And she understands the importance of the business community, and it's not going to be about raising taxes or doing any one specific thing. It's going to be, What is in the best interest of all Americans? And I think if history is our guide, we've had stronger economies, more wealth creation, under Democratic presidents than we have under Republican presidents. So I don't understand why all my capitalist friends aren't Democrats.…
L.G.: There's a big fundraiser on October 17 in Washington, and you're listed as one of the hosts-the National Women's Finance Summit. Will you be there for that?
L.R.: Yes, yes, I will definitely be there for that.
L.G.: And I noticed that all the thousand-dollar seats are sold, but you can still get some $2,300 V.I.P. seats. Do you want to try to sell any to our readers now?
L.R.: [Laughs.] I would strongly advise your readers to snatch up whatever is there. It's going to be a spectacular day. That event is quintessentially Hillary Clinton. Look at what she's doing. She is, first of all, empowering women in a way that we could have only dreamed about when we graduated from college. But that's secondary to bringing her foreign-policy team, her economics team, her political team, herself to educate everyone about what she believes. They're all going to take whatever questions we have. She's going to listen; they're going to listen. She can't be there the whole day, but it's so quintessentially Hillary. Politics is so boring, where they ask for your money, you get a glass of cheap wine and a biscuit, and then when you say, "You know, I have an idea about health care or I have an idea about inheritance tax," nobody wants to listen to you, because what they really want is your money. Hillary is the opposite. Obviously there aren't enough hours in the day to listen to every idea, but she is listening, and she is responding.
---
EEE - And then, she became a Rothschild:
---
When 67-year-old British banking scion Sir Evelyn Rothschild first set eyes on 44-year-old Lynn Forester at the 1998 Bilderberg conference—the matchmaker was none other than Henry Kissinger—she was already a woman of major means.
SECTION II: “Bill” and the Rockefellers
Mr. Bill Clinton had a close family friend in the Rockefellers:
http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2006/07/21/News/336952.html
---
LITTLE ROCK - Dignitaries that included former President Bill Clinton attended Thursday's final public service for billionaire Lt. Gov. Win Rockefeller, but it was Rockefeller's association with the Boy Scouts, his love of family and his ability to talk to regular folks that marked the occasion…
Rockefeller was a billionaire and great-grandson of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller. He also was the son of a former Arkansas governor, the late Winthrop Rockefeller.
The elder Rockefeller was governor when a young student from Hot Springs named Bill Clinton was awarded a Rhodes scholarship. The governor invited the young Clinton to the family ranch at Petit Jean Mountain near Morrilton after Clinton received the honor in 1969. There he met Win Rockefeller, Clinton said in an impromptu news conference after the funeral services had ended and the crowds dispersed. "I was 22 and he was 20," Clinton said. "We spent the whole evening together and were friends ever since." Clinton, a Democrat, would later appoint Rockefeller, a Republican, to the State Police Commission in 1981. He served there until 1995.
Rockefeller was a man who could put aside political differences and believe "we should all go forward together," Clinton said. "He always treated people with humanity and respect, and was clearly proud of his life," Clinton said.
---
So, Mr. Bill Clinton probably still has a close family friend in the Rockefellers.
SECTION III: “Obama” and Churchill
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/26/2199175.htm
---
US presidential hopeful Barack Obama is a distant relative not only of President George W Bush but also of wartime British prime minister Winston Churchill, according to US researchers.
---
As I posted the article “From 1776 To 2008 Through 1997 and 2001” on February 14, 2008, Winston Churchill’s son married Pamela Digby, America’s ambassador to France appointed by Mr. Bill Clinton, whose aunt was the wife of a Rothschild.
“Obama,” “Hillary,” “Bill Clinton,” the Rothschilds, and the Rockefellers are all related and associated in a sense.
*************************************
Simply, that is why I am telling you that what you need is the US Religious Revolution but not the dreaming of US political renovation.
It is because no one regards Jesus Christ as a political player but a religious figure even in modern critical communities.
And, truly Jesus Christ said: You cannot serve both the God and wealth.
If you don’t serve God well, how can you serve the people the God kindly created?
(There are many Japanese who are interested in the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, since the Bank of Japan and the Imperial Family are believed to have a close tie, in whatever sense, with those super rich clans based in the U.S. and the U.K.
Before the battle in Waterloo between Napoleon and the U.K., the Rothschilds had no decisive financial power in the U.K. and Europe.
Before the US Civil War, the Rockefellers had no decisive financial power in the U.S. and the world.
And, before the breakdown of ATT, Microsoft, Yahoo, or Google had no chances for subsistence, if they had existed then.
They cannot defeat history in which they may be just playing minor roles.
So, choose your president based on your view on history but not on the temporary financial power those candidates can rely on, since China and India are gaining momentum, good or bad, through the framework against the West Japan has established as the only major non-Christian military and economic power of the world class even before WWII.
Her Majesty in any kingdom should not succumb to their influence, as my advice if you are close to any including the Vatican.)
