(The Summer of Japan, 2009 )If a certain Judaist is a very excellent musician, any Christian king or president would like to protect him or her from other narrow-minded Christians:
----------
List of Jewish American composers
Jewish composers constitute 20% of the award's recipients, although Jewish Americans are less than 2% of the United States population.
This list includes both Jewish composers who were born and raised in the United States and who were born in Europe or elsewhere and immigrated to and settled in the United States...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_composers
----------
Accordingly, any Judaist has to think of being a very excellent musician to be protected in a Christian country.
*** *** *** ***
In 1875, then British premier Benjamin Disraeli (1804 – 1881) obtained a short-term loan from Lionel de Rothschild in order to purchase 44% of the shares of the Suez Canal Company, which was actually £4 million.
It is said the wealthiest person in the British history is Queen Victoria (1837-1901), since her personal assets totaled £5 million.
But, in 1818 the Rothschild bank had already arranged a £5 million loan to the Prussian government and the issuing of bonds for government loans.
Therefore, the Rothschild family in London had apparently more money than British Queen in the late 19th century, at least.
Accordingly, Rothschilds' being Judaists did not matter at all to the monarch and the government of the United Kingdom so long as they could use Rothschilds' money as need arose.
So, in this example of the House of Rothschild in London, it is the Christian monarch and the Christian Government that were in a dependent position without complaints, since such a huge fund could be at their hand from the Rothschild family very easily and legally while shutting up other European Christian governments.
It is the Christian monarch and the Christian Government that have not minded the difference in religion at all if huge money is involved, though it is the Rothschilds that have had super assets.
Conversely, if the Christian monarch and the Christian Government had questioned religion of their financier so as to alienate any non-Christian super-wealthy clan observing non-Christian religion, there should not have been such an extravagant success of the House of Rothschild and Judaist Americans of today.
However, is this kind of behavior of the British Government and the American Government very Christian?
If no Judaists, including the Rothschild clan, had had no ability to make a big fortune, what should have happened to them in England and America?
(From a religious point of view, however, it might be concluded that the Anglo-Saxons are closer to Judaism than any other Christian tribes in Europe.)
*** *** *** ***
If any Judaist is poor, any Christian must not traet him badly.
But, can it be very Christian to treat a Judaist very kindly simply because he is super rich like Rothschild?
At least, a Christian has to treat a Judaist very kindly whether the Judaist is super rich or super poor.
Then, all the Judaists would feel safe and secured in a Christian society if they do not become another Rothschild.
And then, American Judaists do not even have to be very excellent musicians or composers.
(To be continued...)
(I may be just a weak soldier but not a gentle officer; yet, stars are greeting above my head and sands are singing under my feet on the shore...which was a midnight summer dream as you know, comrades.
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~UD3T-KRYM/902-jasrac/40510-soranihoshigaaruyouni.htm )
Pro 10:11 The mouth of a righteous man is a well of life: but violence covereth the mouth of the wicked.
Pro 10:12 Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins.
Pro 10:13 In the lips of him that hath understanding wisdom is found: but a rod is for the back of him that is void of understanding.
Pro 10:14 Wise men lay up knowledge: but the mouth of the foolish is near destruction.