Tokyo
How Mankind was Split before Abraham
It is very interesting how native Americans reached the American Continent to spread there as far as the southern end of South America about 13,000 years ago, taking 1,000 years from Alaska to Patagonia.
It is also very interesting how native Australians reached Australia about 50,000 years ago.
It is also so interesting how original Japanese reached the Japanese Archipelago, the islands situated far east of the Eurasian Continent. Indeed the Japanese Archipelago is situated east of the Chinese Continent which is northeast of the Indian subcontinent which is east of Persia and Mesopotamia which is east of Palestine and Jerusalem. East of the Japanese Archipelago is simply the Pacific Ocean twice as large as the Atlantic Ocean. No great kingdoms ever existed east of the Japanese Archipelago except some minor tribal territories in Hawaii and mainland America.
According to a unique study, the Japanese race consists of three different types of people, each from different historical background. Believe or not, Japanese include one of the oldest groups of mankind since their establishment as Cro-Magnons.
The first group of the Japanese race (Japanese-1) is direct descendants of Cro-Magnons, or the first tier of mankind, as with some Swedes, some British, and some Portuguese. The second group of the Japanese race (Japanese-3) belongs to a branch of the second tier of mankind that includes most of East Asians, West and Southern Asians, and native Americans. At another branch of this tier includes most of Europeans. But this branch can be split into two branches: one consisting of northern Europeans and another consisting of some Mediterranean Europeans, Indians, and some Asians that include the third group of the Japanese race (Japanese-2).
This can be summarized in the following Figure.
(C2)
Cro-Magnons ----- Portuguese-1, British-1, (Swedes-1, Japanese-1)
Cro-Magnons ----- Portuguese-1, British-1, (Swedes-1, Japanese-1)
|
--- Filipinos
|
|
| (C3)
------------- Native Americans, Basques
| |
| ----- (Koreans, Japanese-3, Chinese-1), Swedes-2, Turks
| |
| ----- (Jordanians, Egyptians), Indonesians
|
| (C4)
----------- (Germans, British-2), (Spanish, French)
|
| (C5)
----- (Mongolians, Thais), (Tamils, Japanese-2),
Portuguese-2, Northern Indians, (Italians, Chinese-2)
Note: Each of parentheses includes close races.
In other word, the ancestors (C4 and C5) of most of Europeans and some Asians had common ancestors who were split from the ancestors (C3) of native Americans, West Asians, and East Asians. But C3, C4, and C5 of mankind had split from the direct descendants of Cro-Magnons (C2).
In this theory, Filipinos are unique enough with some possibility that their ancestors had been mixed with Neanderthaler-type of original human beings, though mots of C3 mankind seem to inherit some features or genes of Neanderthaler-type of original human beings.
From this point of view, the existence of the US is very significant as racial origins of people seem to lose some critical potential to keep, sustain, and develop unique cultural aspects of each race.
Back to the Figure, in my theory the Sumerians belong to the C2 tier. And they built some city states in Mesopotamia. But from the suburb of Ur, one of Sumerian cities, the tribe of Abraham appeared. So, theoretically, Christ Jesus and other Hebrews are close to C2 mankind more than any other races.
This C2 mankind seems to be featured by very peace-loving ethos. That is why Hebrews, Swedes, and Japanese are not suitable for building a global empire.
Anyway, you have to think why God didn't tell Abraham to conquer Sumerian cities to be an emperor of Mesopotamia 4,000 years ago. It is probably Hebrews were especially peace-loving in comparison with other tribes around them.
It is also why Japan still sticks to its 70-year old Pacifist Constitution.
**** **** ****
Mar 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.
------------- Native Americans, Basques
| |
| ----- (Koreans, Japanese-3, Chinese-1), Swedes-2, Turks
| |
| ----- (Jordanians, Egyptians), Indonesians
|
| (C4)
----------- (Germans, British-2), (Spanish, French)
|
| (C5)
----- (Mongolians, Thais), (Tamils, Japanese-2),
Portuguese-2, Northern Indians, (Italians, Chinese-2)
Note: Each of parentheses includes close races.
In other word, the ancestors (C4 and C5) of most of Europeans and some Asians had common ancestors who were split from the ancestors (C3) of native Americans, West Asians, and East Asians. But C3, C4, and C5 of mankind had split from the direct descendants of Cro-Magnons (C2).
In this theory, Filipinos are unique enough with some possibility that their ancestors had been mixed with Neanderthaler-type of original human beings, though mots of C3 mankind seem to inherit some features or genes of Neanderthaler-type of original human beings.
From this point of view, the existence of the US is very significant as racial origins of people seem to lose some critical potential to keep, sustain, and develop unique cultural aspects of each race.
Back to the Figure, in my theory the Sumerians belong to the C2 tier. And they built some city states in Mesopotamia. But from the suburb of Ur, one of Sumerian cities, the tribe of Abraham appeared. So, theoretically, Christ Jesus and other Hebrews are close to C2 mankind more than any other races.
This C2 mankind seems to be featured by very peace-loving ethos. That is why Hebrews, Swedes, and Japanese are not suitable for building a global empire.
Anyway, you have to think why God didn't tell Abraham to conquer Sumerian cities to be an emperor of Mesopotamia 4,000 years ago. It is probably Hebrews were especially peace-loving in comparison with other tribes around them.
It is also why Japan still sticks to its 70-year old Pacifist Constitution.
**** **** ****
Mar 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.