Unique Baptism?
Toward the Izu Peninsula in the Direction of the South West
Weak or Strong Balance: 1 vs. 1 or 100 vs. 100
Somebody would point at the question: "Can the expression 'the Japan's glory' be grammatically correct? It should be 'the Japanese glory,''Japan's glory,' or 'the glory of Japan's.'"
You don't say "the John's glory" but "the glory of John's" or "the glory of John."
However Japan is not John. Japan is special and exceptional. And, I like the sound of "the Japan's glory."
I wrote thinking, "The, Uh - let me think, Japan's glory." This is understandable.
Anyway, remember that nobody in Washington D.C. and Beijing can read and write Japanese as much as I do, though somebody in Japan's Government must be able to read and write English better than I.
SECTION I: Explosion of Energy & Machine
After the Industrial Revolution through the World War One, even riding on the recovery from the Great Depression, primary energy consumption and the global population grew by leaps and bounds.
(Click to enlarge.)(http://change-agent.jp/files/Energy_Challenge_(2)_David_Hughes.pdf )
However, it will start to interfere with the natural state of the nature and environments on the finite planet earth sooner or later.
SECTION II: Yearly Change of Temperature against the Norm
The change in the global temperature on the ground has not increased linearly or simply proportionally with a simple increase of energy consumed by mankind and a simple increase of CO2 released to the air from the industry and households.
(Click to enlarge.)(http://www.city.asahikawa.hokkaido.jp/files/kankyohozen/forum/ikensyu/setubetupage/04-05hajimeni.pdf )
You can see roughly three periods of time in the above figure. They may be explained in the following manner:
1. 1880-1940: With development of industry in Europe, North America, and Japan, the temperature was steadily rising, for energy and CO2 were released to the environment.
2. 1940-1980: Despite with further development of industry in Europe, North America, and Japan, the temperature did not rise at all, while more energy and CO2 were released to the environment.
3. 1980-2010: With multiplied development of industry in Europe, North America, Japan, China, and other areas, the temperature has been rising again, as much more energy and CO2 have been released to the environment
But, it is apparent that the temperature rise is not simply following an increase in amount of energy consumed and CO2 released by mankind.
You cannot trust the global warming theory relying only on the CO2 effect. It cannot be so simple, as the above two figures indicated.
SECTION III: Climate Seesaw Balanced at Very High Level
The key to understanding the above presented question is as follows. I call it "the Theory of the Climate Seesaw Balanced at a Very High Level."
Mankind's Interference with the nature and the global climate has only a very small influence even with that huge increase of consumption of primary energy and discharge of CO2.
But, it can be sometimes enough to break the balance between the cooling force and the warming force on the earth. Each natural force must have, for example, 100 units of power. Mankind's energy and CO2 release to the air must have, for instance, 0.001 units of power. But, it must be large enough to topple the seesaw.
According to this hypothesis, each of the above periods in the history can be explained as below:
1. 1880-1940: When "Up Force" gets 100.001 while "Down Force" is 100.000, the seesaw would be surely raised on the upside.
2. 1940-1980: When "Down Force" becomes also 100.001 with a small addition from the nature, the seesaw would be again balanced at a higher level.
3. 1980-2010: When "Up Force" again increases to 100.002 while "Down Force" is 100.001, the seesaw would be surely raised on the upside, more clearly.
You may call this hypothesis "the EEE-Theory of the Climate Seesaw Balanced at a Very High Level."
(Note that if there is no cooling power on the earth, the earth would be hotter and hotter due to the CO2 effect.
Conversely, as the cooling power is so strong, the CO2 effect cannot work proportionally to its increase in the air.
Mathematically, 0 = 1 - 1 = 100 - 100. "1-1" means a low level of balance; "100-100" means a high level of balance.)
*** *** *** ***
Today's miracle - a gray heron of Japan's
(Click to enlarge.)This blog is truly read by Japanese experts who belong to the government, the media, academic circles, etc.
EEE-Reporters is included in a certain list of blogs and web sites which are mostly posted, owned, or run by them.
http://a.hatena.ne.jp/branch/simple
It is a kind of miracles that those Japanese read this English blog while they must be very busy and they have probably no interest in Western religions.
Anyway, they love to hear Western elites or Chinese elites who might be secretly reading EEE-Reporter as part of the miracle.
(http://davidbmidi.home.mchsi.com/beatles/plsplsme.mid
Source:http://www.davidbmidi.com/
This is a breakthrough song for the notable British band, in my view.
Every successful star has his or her own breakthrough work.
For a religious figure, it is of course his performance of a ritual. David danced like a mad man. Solomon received a queen from the south. But, today Israelites or Israelis have been simply jumping and high-touching on the street of Gaza.)
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.