Unmanned traffic system I am in, though...
(Did you say, "Go, Go?")Saturday for Marching of Justice
(allez, allez, samedi!)
It is absurd that an economic system hinders a person from gaining access to foods and goods needed for his living.
Mankind as a whole has a huge capability to produce foods and goods in an amount needed to satisfy all the members.
However, you need money to access foods and goods. So, money is a problem but not production capability for mankind.
Due to software called an economic system, mankind cannot enjoy foods and goods that can be abundantly produced through hardware he has invented.
So, we need superior software called religion to control an economic system.
This is my basic idea.
SECTION I: American Employment for 2012 Election
(Unit: 1000 persons)
Nobody showed their appreciation and gratitude to the U.K., Japan, Germany, France, Switzerland, and the Netherlands in the 2010 Midterm Election in America.
So, that result was produced through hard decision by American voters, including a key and swing group consisting of ordinary/poor European Americans who eventually opted for free economy, though not necessary market economy.
This is a warning to President Mr. Barack Obama, the Israel lobby, and the New York Times.
Anyway, the U.S. is the No.1 target for Japanese overseas direct investment. Japan infused 20.4 trillion yen or $255 billion to America as foreign direct investment (FDI).
Japan is the No.2 FDI provider to America in terms of an amount, taking a share of 11.4%.
Japan is the No.2 employer of American workers. Japanese businesses or affiliated companies employ 665,200 workers in America.
(http://s-navigator.net/tips.php?q=Why_USA )
Though the Tea Party Movement has succeeded in this Midterm election, the calling "Tea Party" might not sound comfortable to the British.
So, the coming 2012 Presidential Election would be influenced by how much each presidential candidate would show their respect for the U.K., Japan, Germany, France, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, of course, more than for China.
SECTION II: The New York Times & China Never Learn
The New York Times is forced to write, though quoting another news agency's report, "the Chinese seaman, who was later freed, was at fault."
But, the truth must be more clearly stated: the video footage clearly showed the illegal Chinese fishing boat violently charged two of Japan Coast Guard ships.
The New York Times specifically wrote: As Reuters reported, Japan’s government had "released the video for viewing by a small number of lawmakers but refused to make it public for fear of inflaming anti-Chinese sentiment." The news agency added, the clips "could harden Japanese public opinion against China by appearing to show the Chinese seaman, who was later freed, was at fault."
On Friday, Yoshito Sengoku, Japan’s chief cabinet secretary, told reporters, "If it turns out that a public servant deliberately leaked images, then that is a clear breach of the law."
However, it should clearly state that the video presents evidence that it was Japan's Coast Guard that had been attacked. Otherwise, some readers might suspect that the Japanese Governmernt has tried to hide the video, since there are some scenes showing illegal action on the Japan Coast Guard's side.
As the Japanese Government did not want to have China lose face, P.M. Mr. Naoto Kan and Minister Mr. Sengoku tried to hide the video from the world.
The video clearly showed the illegal Chinese fishing boat violently charged two of Japan Coast Guard ships trying to halt the Chinese ship in an orderly manner.
The goodwill of the Japanese Government to Chinese leaders is sometimes abused by The New York Times, since the pro-China media virtually suggests even in this article that Chinese fishing boats operating around Japan's Senkaku Islands have been always unfairly harassed by Japan Coast Guard ships, by only quoting a Chinese American's (?) remark: "Japanese patrol boats usually chase away Chinese vessels." Why are not Japanese comments about the Senkaku incident on The New York Times? Can a despotic communist government be more trustworthy to The New York Times than the democratic and free state Japan?
In addition, in the second video on the following New York Times Web page, some English translation is not correct, though it seems to have been made by a poster to YouTube:
"It has just collided into the astern of the starboard" should be:
"It just came to collide into the astern of the starboard of our ship."
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/05/leaked-video-shows-clash-at-sea-between-chinese-and-japanese-ships/?scp=1&sq=Senkaku&st=cse
For your reference, the following is false and malicious illustration of the so called "collision" authorized and made public to the world by the Chinese Government trying to have Japan lose face:
Liars in the Chinese Communist Government can always find friends in The New York Times. This is a lesson we have to learn.
Anyway, truth is:
(The blue ship putting the helm to port is of course the Chinese fishing boat.)APPENDIX. Historical Analysis on the Senkaku Islands (recap)
(Please set the Encode in Page menu of your browser at Unicode to correctly read Kanji characters used below.)
First of all click the following map (The New York Times should see that Yonakuni Island and the Yaeyama Islands are also part of Okinawa Prefecture as China and Taiwan have never made an objection in the past).
The difficult part to understand is mostly between past China and past Okinawa rather than between present China and present Japan. Specifically, the Senkaku issue rests on relationships between the Ming and later the Ching Dynasties and the Okinawa (Ryukyu) Kingdom which is however now Okinawa Prefecture, Japan.
Now, the oldest human bones found in Okinawa Prefecture is of 32,000 years ago and then of 18,000 years ago. The oldest record of people visiting Japan's Imperial Court from Okinawa is of A.D. 714.
More clearly, a group of Japanese people with agriculture skills moved to Okinawa islands from Kyusyo of Japan proper as late as the 10th century. Since then, the Okinawa (Ryukyu) people moved around from the main Okinawa island to Yaeyama Islands including Ishigaki Island, Iriomote Island, and Yonakuni Island. They frequently sailed around the Senkaku Islands partly due to the ocean current flowing north from the Yaeyama Islands. As the above map clearly indicates, the Senkaku Islands are too far for fishermen living coastal ares of mainland China while Taiwan indigenous people had no skills or customs sailing around north on the East China Sea, before modernization.
But, if you have any doubts on Japan's Senkaku, check the related history below presented.
1274: The Yuan Empire of China, a successor of Genghis Khan's Mongolian empire, launches war against Japan, for Japan governed by the Hojyo samurai clan refused to be subject to the Yuan emperor. So, Yuan of Mongolians dispatches 30,000 troops to Japan through the Korean Peninsula; they are however destroyed when landing on northern Kyusyu partly due to a typhoon called "kamikaze" and mostly due to courageous samurais. All the survivors of the Yuan troops fled back to the Chinese Continent over the sea.
1281: The Yuan Empire this time mobilizes 40,000 troops for a route from the Korean Peninsula and 100,000 troops for another route through the East China Sea to northern Kyusyu. They are however destroyed when landing on northern Kyusyu partly due to a typhoon called "kamikaze" and mostly due to courageous samurais. All the survivors of the Yuan troops fled back to the Chinese Continent over the sea.
(Some Chinese today claim that the Yuan Dynasty occupied the Senkaku Islands as its own territory. But, the fact seems only that the Yuan fleets carrying 100,000 troops just sailed over the East China Sea to Kyusyu of Japan. And only a few could sail back after the failure in invading Japan proper or mainland Japan that includes the Kyusyu Island.)
The 14th Century: Japanese pirates called Wakou intensifies their activities attacking coastal areas of China facing the East China Sea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wokou
(Accordingly, for a Chinese Dynasty, it became more important to defend its coastal areas, residents, and subjects living there than to set any ineffective or nominal border on the surface of the East China Sea. So, official maps a Chinese Dynasty would draw should show a defence line rather than a border on the sea.)
1368: The Ming Dynasty is established in China by the Hongwu Emperor.
1372: King of Okinawa (also called Ryukyu) Satto brings a tribute to the Ming empire.
1401: The then samurai king of Japan (shogun) Ashikaga Yoshimitsu also sends an envoy to the Ming Dynasty to establish diplomatic relationships between Japan and Ming for benefits of trade.
1404: The Ming Court acknowledges Yoshimitsu as King of Japan who is allowed to trade with Ming in the form of bringing goods as tribute and receiving gifts in return. (However, the emperor of Japan [called Ten-nou] has nothing to do with this diplomatic relationships. This title of King of Japan is not welcomed by noblemen around the emperor in Kyoto.)
To make clear the difference from the Japanese pirates, Japanese merchants authorized for the trade are obliged to carry a licence plate or a tally stick(called Kangoufu) each.
Till 1640's when Ming is replaced by Ching, Japan sends official envoys for trade total 19 times to Ming.
1404: The Yongle Emperor of Ming authorizes King of Okinawa as his subject to allow trade with Ming.
Till 1866, the Ming and then the Ching Dynasties have sent envoys to Okinawa total 23 times for an Imperial investiture to attest successive Kings of Okinawa.
Till 1879, the Okinawa Kingdom has sent official envoys for trade total 173 times to the Ming and then total 68 times to the Ching.
1405: The Ming Court starts to send a series of seven naval expeditions led by Zheng He (Tei-wa in Japanese) to reach Indochina, Indonesia, India, Iran, the Arabian Peninsula, and Somalia of East Africa. This naval project has continued till 1433. However, this historical voyage is not intended to directly occupy overseas territory but to persuade overseas nations to bring a tribute to the emperor of Ming like in the case of the Kingdom of Okinawa.
1534: An imperial envoy from the Ming called Chin-Kan (so called in Japanese, [陳侃]) writes an official report called Shi-Ryukyu--Roku (in Japanese, [使琉球録]) where he mentions some islands that are identified as part of the Senkaku Islands.
In this report, Chin-Kan describes it was after his ship with that Okinawa people on board (returning to mainland Okinawa) passed an island which was closer to mainland Okinawa than the Senkaku Islands that the Okinawa people showed great relief, as if they had returned to their home territory.
(So, China today claims that Okinawa people did not regard the Senkaku Islands as being within their territory, since Okinawa people did not show great relief when they saw the Senkaku Islands. But, it is a very subjective remark and personal judgment by the envoy Chin-Kan himself.)
1562: An imperial envoy from the Ming called Kaku-Jyo-Rin (in Japanese, [郭汝霖]) also writes a report ([重編使琉球録])and mentions some islands that are identified as part of the Senkaku Islands in his official report. Kaku expresses the Senkaku Islands as a kind of border for the Ming.
(So, China today claims that the Senkaku Islands were regarded as border islands on their side by the Ming Dynasty. However, without officially recognizing the Senkaku Islands as their own, any Ming's envoy would mention the Islands in a report as a place critical to take note of for the defence. Especially, the Ming's defence was not against a subject kingdom of Okinawa but Japanese pirates. What was needed to be described is not a border but a defence line.)
1562: Admiral Hu Zongxian or Ko-Sou-Ken (in Japanese, [胡宗憲]) of the Ming issues a now-famous map called Cyu-Kai-Zu (in Japanese, [籌海図編]) prepared by scholar Tei-Jyaku-So (in Japanese, [鄭若曽]) where a sea area including the Senkaku Islands is specified as a kind of national defence line.
(http://www.geocities.jp/tanaka_kunitaka/senkaku/chokaizuhen-1562/ )(So, China today claims that the Senkaku Islands were regarded as border islands on their side by Ming.)
However, in this map, an island, called Kei-Ko-San (in Japanese, [鶏籠山]) then regarded as belonging to Taiwan by the Ming Court in Beijing is also put down.
(Accordingly, Japanese experts claim that this map does not exclusively include islands within the territory of Ming, since Taiwan then did not belong to the Ming empire. Especially, the Ming's defence was not against a subject kingdom of Okinawa but Japanese pirates. What was needed to be described is not a border but a defence line.)
1592 and 1598: The then samurai ruler of Japan Toyotomi Hideyoshi launches war with the Ming (partly because Ming treated Hideyoshi as subject King of Japan and proud Hideyoshi go angry), taking a route to Beijing through the Korean Peninsula, though this campaign with 100,000 and more samurai troops were terminated due to death of Hideyoshi of illness.
The Kingdom Okinawa joined this Hideyoshi's campaign on the logistics side.
1609: Samurai lord Shimazu in southern Kyusyu of Japan proper invaded Okinawa with 3000 samurai troops to establish its occupancy in Okinawa islands. The king of Okinawa however is allowed to survive as a subject to the Shimazu clan who is a subject of the samurai king (shogun) Tokugawa in Edo (Tokyo).
Since then, the Kingdom Okinawa was subject to both the Ming Court of China and the Shimazu clan of Japan.
1614: A regional official document of Jyugen (in Japanese, [壽源県志]) prefecture of the Ming is issued but does not include the Senkaku Islands as part of its territory, while Jyugen prefecture could cover the sea area near the Senkaku Islands as its administrative territory.
1644: The Ming Dynasty of the Han Chinese collapsed; the Ching Dynasty of Manchu was established in mainland China. As Manchu is traditionally from Manchuria or currently the north east region of China, the Ching Court in Beijing abolished or changed many Han customs and ways of administration.
1683: The Ching Dynasty officially takes Taiwan into its territory.
1684: The Ching Dynasty releases an official document ([福建通志]) on Fujian Province facing the East China Sea. In this document, the Senkaku Islands are not included in the administrative region of the Fujian Province government.
1717: An official document of Shora (in Japanese, [諸羅県志]) prefecture of Taiwan Province is released to define the north border of Taiwan at the Dai-Kei-Ko-San (in Japanese) Island which is in the south of the Senkaku Islands.
1718: An official document of Neitoku (in Japanese, [寧徳県志]) prefecture of Fujian Province is released but does not include the Senkaku Islands as part of its territory, while Neitoku prefecture could cover the sea area near the Senkaku Islands as its administrative territory.
1765: The Taiwan local government issues an official document called Zokusyudai-Taiwan-Fushi (in Japanese, [続修台湾府志]) where the north border of Taiwan is set at the Dai-Kei-Ko-San (in Japanese, [大鶏籠山]) Island which is in the south of the Senkaku Islands.
1838: The Ching Court issues an official document ([重纂福建通志福建海防全図]) with an attached map named the Fujian Naval Defence General Map in which however the Senkaku Islands are not included.
1840: The Taiwan local government issues an official document called the Taiwan 17 Country Defencce Status ([台湾道姚瑩稟奏台湾十七国設防状]) where the north border of Taiwan is set at the Dai-Kei-Ko-San (in Japanese, [大鶏籠山]) Island which is in the south of the Senkaku Islands.
1868: The Tokugawa samurai regime fell in Japan. Samurais against the Tokugawa clan forms new government with the emperor at the political core of the nation Japan. Accordingly, all the samurai lords and clans in Japan, including Shimazu in southern Kyusyu with Okinawa belongs to the new government in Tokyo.
1871:An water administration agency of the Taiwan local government issues an official document called the Tansuichou-shi (in Japanese, [淡水庁志]) where the north border of the sea territory of Taiwan is set at the Dai-Kei-Ko-San (in Japanese, [大鶏籠山]) Island which is in the south of the Senkaku Islands.
1879: The Empire of Japan changes status of the Kingdom of Okinawa into Okinawa Prefecture of the Empire.
1884: Tatsushiro Koga, a resident in Naha City of Okinawa, explored the Senkau Islands for possible business.
1885: Tatsushiro Koga files an application to the Government in Tokyo for approval of his landing on the Senkaku Islands to cultivate them. The then Okinawa governor also requests the Imperial Government of Japan to declare territorial jurisdiction over the Senkaku Islands. However the Government in Tokyo does not approve it, since it is unclear whether or not the Senkaku Islands does not belong to Ching or any other sovereignty. Yet, the then Interior Ministry in Tokyo rules that the Okinawa governor may set a land mark indicating occupancy of the Empire of Japan in the Senkaku Islands after the prefectural government confirms the state of the Islands as no man's land.
1894: The Japan-Sino War erupts.
1895: On January 14, the Empire of Japan takes the Senkaku Islands into its territory after investigations of the state of the Islands.
Tatsushiro Koga starts his business to build a factory to process fish in the Senkaku Islands. His business continues till 1940 or so with 200 or so empolyees and their families living in the Islands. This is the first record of residence and business performed on the Senkaku Islands in the known history of Japan, China, and Taiwan.
1895: The Japan-Sino War ends with victory of the Empire of Japan. The Empire and the Ching Dynasty concludes the Treaty of Shimonoseki on April 17. Taiwan is transferred to the Empire, according to the Treaty. However, it does not mention the Senkaku Islands (as the Ching Court has already admitted the Islands as Japan's).
1941: The Empire of Japan embarks in a war with the United Sates, which constitutes the Pacific Stage of WWII.
1945: The Empire of Japan surrenders the United Sates who occupies whole Japan, including Okinawa Prefecture and its Senkaku Islands.
1947: The new Constitution of Japan is enforced to replace the Imperial Constitution.
1949: The Chinese Communist Party takes over the Chinese Continent through the Chinese Civil War in 1949 to build the People's Republic of China; accordingly the Chinese Nationalist Party moves to Taiwan to build the Republic of China.
1951: Occupation of Japan by the U.S. ends with conclusion of the Peace Treaty signed in San Francisco. However, Okinawa Prefecture, including its Senkaku Islands, is still kept under administration of the United States.
1953: On January 8, the People's Daily published by the Chinese Communist Party presents documentary material to explain a state of Okinawa and an American policy on Okinawa where the Senkaku Islands are clearly stated as belonging to Okinawa Prefecture.
(Click to enlarge.)http://www.jcp.or.jp/seisaku/2010/20101004_senkaku_rekisii/19530108_jn.jpg
1968: A committee for Far-East economy of the United Nations explores the East China Sea to find great reserves of crude oil.
1971: In April, Taiwan starts to claim its territorial jurisdiction on the Senkaku Islands.
In December, China starts to claim its territorial jurisdiction on the Senkaku Islands.
1972: On May 15, the U.S. returns administrative right of Okinawa Prefecture, including the Senkaku Islands, to the Japanese Government in Tokyo.
1972: In September, Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanak visits Beijing to talk with Chinese Premier Chou En-lai and Chairman Mao Zedong to establish diplomatic relationships between the two nations. Japan severs official connections with Taiwan.
However, in their meeting with Kakuei Tanaka, both Chou and Mao avoid discussion on the Senkaku Islands, though Tanaka raises the issue to Chou.
1989: The so-called Tiananmen massacre occurs in Beijing where many students in demonstrations requesting democracy are attacked and arrested by the Chinese military and police.
After this incident, the Chinese Communist Government starts to educate Chinese children and students following an anti-Japanese policy. The Chinese leaders decide to present Japan as an enemy for students to attack. Students with any complaints to the Chinese Communist Party are not allowed to criticize the Party but encouraged to direct their anger to Japan.
2010: In the wake of violation of Japan's territorial water and the Japan-China agreement on fishing around the Senkaku Islands by a Chinese illegal trawler whose skipper is arrested but released by the Japanese Government, the U.S. Government confirms that the Japan-U.S. Security Arrangements apply to the Senkaku Islands.
In summary, no past documents and maps officially published in China in these 500 years do not state that the Senkaku Islands belong to China.
Rather, some such documents clearly exclude the Senkaku Islands from a relevant administrative territory of a publishing local government.
But, from the beginning, a Chinese empire had no clear distinction between administrative areas of the empire and tributary nations and between its defence line and its border. If people who belonged to an empire had lived in a certain place and there had been a need to protect them by force, the place would be regarded as its territory.
In neither this traditional context nor a modern concept, China has never established its territorial jurisdiction on the Senkaku Islands. Therefore, though the Islands are so far from Japan proper, they belong to Japan, since they were a familiar place for Japanese envoys and Okinawa envoys sailing to and back from China passing the Islands far more often than Chinese envoys did since 1372.
Now you know why the Senkaku Islands do not belong to China and Taiwan even when judging based on the Chinese claims. But, how do the Islands belong to Japan?
It is because the Senkaku Islands belong to Okinawa (Ryukyu). There is an island called Ishigaki-jima (the main island of the Yaeyama Islnads) where Okinawa residents or fishermen have lived from ancient days. And, there is a strong ocean stream from Ishigaki-jima Island to the Senkaku Islands. Fishermen in Ishigaki can easily reach around Senkaku to do their business. It is reflected in some old songs or stories of Okinawa.
In addition, the Chinese name of the Senkaku Islands meaning an island to angle for fish is reasonably thought to come after an old calling of the Islands by Okinawa/Ishigaki people. Okinawa people call the main Senkaku Island "Yoko"-jima (meaning a side island), or once called "Tsure"-jima, meaning an accompanying island the sound of which is similar to "tsuri" which is also similar to "tsuru" in Japanese, meaning angling for fish. There is no such material as to more reasonably expalian the origin of the Chinese name of the Islands meaning an island to angle for fish.
Put simply, the Senkaku Islands issue is not the one between Tokyo, the Senkaku Islands, and Shanghai but between the Yaeyama Islands, the Senkaku Islands, and Beijing. Check the map again!
*** *** *** ***
Recently I have a feeling that the God is angry.
The God can measure a ratio of good behaviors and bad behaviors of mankind as a whole.
If the ratio between good behaviors and bad behaviors among mankind on the earth is 1% to 99%, it is the end of the world.
If it is 49% to 51%, mankind is still destined for collapse as a whole.
If it is 50% to 50%, mankind can survive for a while.
If you think you are the last person that can keep the level at 50% or might reduce it to less than 50% at a certain moment, you will behave very carefully watching every step.
Indeed, 2000 years ago, owing to Christ Jesus, the level of mankind wsa raised above 50%. Today, if the Pope and other religious professionals cannot fulfill this requirement, who should be in charge and involved in it?
This is my basic idea.
I will be busy tomorrow.
And, do you know Osaka is the worst prefecture in Japan in terms of a possibility of being involved in a murder case which is 0.791 men per 100,000 population? And, Okinawa is the second worst being 0.771. So, I will fly to neither Osaka nor Okinawa tomorrow, since Tokyo and Yokohama are on the alert due to the APEC summit meeting scheduled between November 13 and 14 in addition to the leak of the Senkaku videos.
Bona-nox!
(http://il.youtube.com/watch?v=6ofD9t_sULM
Just as it was in 1958...since I do not play the guitar.)
Pro 11:4 Riches profit not in the day of wrath: but righteousness delivereth from death.
Pro 11:5 The righteousness of the perfect shall direct his way: but the wicked shall fall by his own wickedness.
Pro 11:6 The righteousness of the upright shall deliver them: but transgressors shall be taken in their own naughtiness.
Pro 11:7 When a wicked man dieth, his expectation shall perish: and the hope of unjust men perisheth.