Come Back to the Glory of Olive
With the permission of the Creator of mankind, that is God of everybody, I like to write this for you.
Around the first century, it is said Israelites accounted for 10% of all the residents in the territory of the Roman Empire, such as Egypt, Greece, and Asia Minor (in addition to the Euphrates River Area) as well as Palestine.
It means that Israelites resided in most of Roman colonized cities, such as Alexandria, around the Mediterranean and the Black Sea.
* * *
Israelites then with the color of skin similar to contemporary Arabs' lived among white-skinned or light-skinned southern or eastern Europeans, such as Romans, Greeks, Celts, and other tribes.
As Israelites had very distinctive religion, in addition to clear difference in racial traits, they must not have been easily mingled with other races.
When Jerusalem and its Temple were destroyed around 100, those Israelites living in Roman-colonized cities must have faced difficult situations, losing their last resort and spiritual foothold.
What is worse, Christians did not seem to be of a great help for them, unless they converted to Christianity.
(For this reason, many Israelites in Roman colonized cities must have converted to Christianity and thus mingled with other races so as to disappear from the mainstream history.)
The olive skinned Israelites, who must have looked like contemporary Arabs, should just roam about Mediterranean cities and the Iberia Peninsula as well as the Middle East with their unique religion and culture while being rejected by Christian Europeans.
So then, even 2000 years later, their descendants without a nation should have just lived in various cities in Arab countries as minority but with the same olive-color skin as Arabs.
* * *
But, the fact is very different. Mainstream Israelites in the 20th century lived in Germany, Poland, and Russia.
How, then, could the olive skinned people, like contemporary Arabs, without resistance and obstruction get into the Rhine area in Germany and further move into East Europe, carrying and adhering to Judaism, though a conventional theory so claims?
Did Christians, namely white-skinned Europeans, in Germany, Poland, and Russia, marry Israelites and become members of Israelites in and after the 9th century just like a conventional theory so claims or inevitably suggests?
Is it a true reason for the fact that the color of skin of Israelites changed so drastically?
Is it so because it took 1000 years? But, for almost 2000 years, Israelites have been regarded as an invariable enemy to Christians.
* * *
The issue is that Israelites looked like Arabs 2000 years ago; and as they could not have been mingled with Europeans easily, they should have today still looked like Arabs and lived among Arabs like Arabs except religious practices.
But, the fact is mysteriously and decisively different.
* * *
There is another well known theory on Khazar, a unique kingdom around the Black Sea that converted to Judaism as a whole nation in 730, since it had to become neutral between the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Empire (refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars).
As so many Israelites were living around Asia Minor, their descendants must have been living around the coastal area of the Black Sea even in the 8th century; and they must have become members of Khazar.
As not only the religion became the same but also various people with different colors of the skin, including Turkish people and some Caucasian tribes, lived in the kingdom, they must have been mingled racially through interracial marriage.
In this way, white-skinned Israelites must have been born in the coastal area of the Black Sea. There must have been also white skinned people originally of a different race, who were just converted to Judaism so as to become white-skinned Israelites in Khazar.
* * *
The issue is that Israelites looked like Arabs 2000 years ago, but today mainstream Israelites, especially those in the U.S., do not look like Arabs.
But, for example, Chinese today look like Chinese 2000 years ago; Indians today look like Indians 2000 years ago; Iranians today look like Iranians 2000 years ago; Arabs today look like Arabs 2000 years ago; and Europeans and European Americans today look like Europeans 2000 years ago.
But, mainstream Israelites who looked like Arabs 2000 years ago look like Europeans today.
* * *
Which do you believe, the conventional theory that Israelites moved from southern Europe to the Rhine area and then East Europe, or the Khazar theory that Israelites changed their racial constitution in the eighth century in the kingdom of Khazar?
Even if you take the Khazar theory, it does not necessarily lead to denial of the contemporary Israelites' claim that Palestine is their assets, though we have to listen to God on this matter as it is so grave.
What's more, as the Islamic Empire was born and got strong, Khazar converted to Judaism to balance the international pressure on the kingdom.
Then, it is advent of Islam that truly contributed to the birth of white-skinned Israelites in the eighth century!!
* * *
Israelites 2000 years ago looked like Arabs today.
Today, I hope that they declare, claim and assert that their skin is olive and they resemble Arabs, no matter if any individual Israelite looks like an European, namely a Christian.
Then, peace will come faster between Israelites and Muslims.
* * *
Jesus Christ, St. Peter, St. Paul, and so on all looked like Arabs, 2000 years ago.
We have to admit the truth. The skin color olive is blessed more than any other skin colors.
We have to see the color of skin of Jesus Christ on skin of Arabs today.
Muslims are truly blessed in this context, even in terms of the origin of white skinned Israelites.
(As I cannot stop respecting Israelites [for Jesus Christ was one of them], I would talk about them, probably for the time being.
Even if you have a white skin, your ancestors came from Africa just like mine.
[And our shadows look black anyway.]
The norm is black for mankind, though you might love white; besides, I do not hate a white.)
"GOD'S CHOSEN SERVANT"